Jump to content
Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Since 7 October 2026 every request to landrace.wiki passes through Cloudflare, a security service brought in after a denial-of-service attack made the site unreachable. The Privacy policy now explains what this means for your data.

Research:2026-04-02/Journal article/humo-de-kif-1922-prensa-espa-ola-cannabis-marroqu-y-poder-colonial-en-el-estrecho-de-gibraltar

From Landrace.wiki
Research record2 April 2026Journal article
Humo de kif (1922): prensa española, cannabis marroquí y poder colonial en el Estrecho de Gibraltar
Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies · 2025
Reads Antonio Robles's weekly column "Humo de kif", published in La Correspondencia de España in 1922 after the battle of Annual, for how the Spanish press classified the Moroccan population by its cannabis use. Using the concept of pharmacoloniality, the author argues that kif and the pipe served as symbols marking a cultural difference that legitimised the colonial project. The article also considers how the appropriation and aestheticisation of kif have shaped later exchanges in the Strait of Gibraltar. The colonial framing is the object of study here and is reported with attribution.
Record created 15 October 2026 · maintained by landrace.wiki editors · page history
Published2 Apr 2026
TypeJournal article
VenueArizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies
Year2025
CountryMorocco

2026-04-02 2026-10-15 Humo de kif (1922): prensa española, cannabis marroquí y poder colonial en el Estrecho de Gibraltar Journal article History Yasmina Aidi Arizona Journal of Hispanic Cultural Studies 2025 10.1353/hcs.2025.a986863 https://doi.org/10.1353/hcs.2025.a986863 Reads Antonio Robles's weekly column "Humo de kif", published in La Correspondencia de España in 1922 after the battle of Annual, for how the Spanish press classified the Moroccan population by its cannabis use. Using the concept of pharmacoloniality, the author argues that kif and the pipe served as symbols marking a cultural difference that legitimised the colonial project. The article also considers how the appropriation and aestheticisation of kif have shaped later exchanges in the Strait of Gibraltar. The colonial framing is the object of study here and is reported with attribution. Morocco