Talk:Martin 1864 (1973)
More actions
Discussion for: Martin 1864 (1973) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The label gives Lieu: Ban Xay Fong (place: Ban Xay Fong), near Vientiane, in May 1973, and records the plant as cultivée (cultivated). It gives Nom vernac.: Kan Xa Hua nok khao (vernacular name, a Lao name for the plant) and, as uses, aliment (food) and médecine et alimentation? (medicine and food?), with the label's own question mark. The catalogue repeats Cultivée. Seed of drug-type cannabis from elsewhere reached old growing areas from the 1970s (McPartland and Small 2020, pp. 84–85), so the date of this sheet does not exclude introduced seed. The class rests on the label: cultivation at the village of Ban Xay Fong, under a Lao name, for food and medicine. The accession is classified Landrace, by inference from the label and the catalogue. The sheet does not show what became of the crop or whether its seed survives, and no conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
Ban Xay Fong was not found in OpenStreetMap by Nominatim under that spelling; the searches returned other villages of the Vientiane plain, which would be the wrong place. The label puts it near Vientiane and no closer. No coordinate is asserted.
Editorial treatment
The collector field holds the label's own form. The 1860 label reads Collect.: MARTIN Marie A. and the 1864 label Collect.: Marie Martin. The ethnobotanist Marie Alexandrine Martin worked in Laos and Cambodia in these years, but no source read for this page identifies her as this collector, and none is asserted here. Check it before a person page is linked.
The label dates the gathering to the month, 5/73, and the catalogue to May 1973. The collection date field holds the month, not a day.
The local name field holds the label's romanisation Kan Xa Hua nok khao, which is not translated here: no source read for this page glosses it. Its first two words are those of Martin 1860.
Source discrepancies
- The catalogue writes the village Bon Xay Fong; the label reads Ban Xay Fong. The article and the locality field follow the label.
Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 17:26, 23 September 2026 (+07)