Talk:Poilane 1897 (1920)
More actions
Discussion for: Poilane 1897 (1920) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The field note records the plant as planted, beside a dwelling, and describes it. It gives no use and no local name. It is a single gathering and shows neither a continuing population nor a living germplasm holding, so it supports neither a landrace nor a feral classification. The accession is classified Other. No conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
Muong Pun was not found in OpenStreetMap by Nominatim. Sam Neua, the province seat, resolves, but the gathering was made in a district away from the town and the seat is not the collection place. Na Ham and Nam Anh were not searched for separately. No coordinate is asserted.
Editorial treatment
cai nha meo is left untranslated in the article. The phrase names a house of the Meo, the exonym the label uses; whether the article may equate Meo with the Hmong is an open question of 22 September 2026, and it is not equated here.
The province field holds Houaphanh, the present province whose seat is Sam Neua; the locality field holds the label's Muong Pun.
Source discrepancies
- Kew codes the country as Viet Nam while its own locality field reads Laos; Paris codes Laos. The article follows Paris and the Kew locality.
These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 17:25, 23 September 2026 (+07)