Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Nanakorn 27304 (2005)

Discussion page of Nanakorn 27304 (2005)
Talk

Discussion for: Nanakorn 27304 (2005) ViewLinksRelated changes

Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.

Page scope
Nanakorn 27304 (2005) is an Accession — the atomic unit of documentation representing a specific collection event. All scientific data lives here.
Data verification
Check the main page for documentation tier status. Discuss coordinate accuracy, photo quality, or collection details here.

Discussion

Evidentiary scope

The database gives a collector, a number, a date and a province. It is a single gathering and shows neither a continuing population nor a living germplasm holding, so it supports neither a landrace nor a feral classification. The accession is classified Other. No conservation priority is assigned.

QBG publishes no image of this sheet: its database entry reads Specimen's picture not found. The accession is text only until the herbarium supplies a scan.

Georeferencing

QBG's database gives the locality as a province and no more: no district, no village, no coordinate. Under the coordinate ruling of 18 September 2026 that is no point at all, and none is asserted. The locality field holds the province name.

Editorial treatment

QBG's online dates run one day earlier than the labels wherever the two can be compared: Nanakorn 7031, Nanakorn 8642 and Phengklai T-49897 each read a day later on the Forest Herbarium's scan of the same gathering, and two of QBG's Myanmar sheets read a day later in the Smithsonian's record of their duplicates. The collection date field holds the database's date as it stands. Treat it as unconfirmed, and read the label before relying on the day.

This collector's numbers are the same as the QBG numbers of his sheets, here 27304, as on Nanakorn 7031 and Nanakorn 8642. That is the herbarium's practice, not a data error.

These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 17:21, 23 September 2026 (+07)