Talk:NPG-CHN-SHG-0019100001
More actions
Discussion for: NPG-CHN-SHG-0019100001 • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The accession rests on two sources: the department's printed inventory entry for plant introduction 27194 (Inventory No. 22 (1911), p. 71) and the entry for PI 27194 in GRIN-Global, the database of the National Plant Germplasm System, as it stood on 27 October 2026. The inventory names the city and the donor, and nothing more. GRIN-Global states that the lot "no longer exists and can not be requested", so the page gives the lot as gone. No conservation priority is assigned.
Identifier
The identifier NPG-CHN-SHG-0019100001 follows the wiki's seed-accession grammar: holder, ISO 3166-1 alpha-3 country, province segment, month, year, sequence. The department's own number for the lot is PI 27194.
NPGstands for the National Plant Germplasm System of the United States Department of Agriculture, whose database, GRIN-Global, carries the department's plant introductions.CHNis the ISO code for China.SHGstands for Shanghai.- Month
00: the date the seed was gathered is not known. - Year 1910 is the year the department received the lot.
0001is the lot's place, in plant-introduction order, among the holder's lots from the same country, province, month and year.
Classification
The seed was a gift sent from a city, and neither source says where it was grown or by whom, so the accession is classified Unknown.
Collectors and donors
GRIN-Global lists J. M. W. Farnham, of the Chinese Tract Society, as its source; the printed inventory says he presented the seed. No one is said to have gathered it, so the infobox gives no collector.
Location and georeferencing
The inventory names Shanghai and nothing finer. The point 31.23, 121.47 is the point OpenStreetMap gives for the city of Shanghai (node 778910398), a locality georeference for the place the source names, not a collection point. Basis: settlement point. Uncertainty: about 10 km, the radius of the city's built-up core; the city of the time was smaller.
Dates
The date the seed was gathered is not known, so the collection date is empty. Both sources give 25 March 1910 as the date of receipt, the lot's received date. The identifier therefore carries month 00 and the year of receipt.