Talk:Maxwell 97-797 (1997)
More actions
Discussion for: Maxwell 97-797 (1997) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The label records the plant as introduced and cultivated, planted among corn near a village it identifies as red Lahu. It records no use and no legible local name. It is a single gathering. It shows neither a continuing population nor a living germplasm holding, so it supports neither a landrace nor a feral classification. The accession is classified Other. No conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
The label names Pah Dang village in Geut Chang (Kuet Chang) subdistrict at 1,125 m. No village of that name in Mae Taeng District was found in OpenStreetMap by Nominatim or by an Overpass search of the district. No coordinate is asserted, because the settlement the label names could not be placed. The district field follows the label's Mae Dtang, in its usual spelling Mae Taeng.
Editorial treatment
The accession is filed under the Academy's sheet, which carries the same label as the Forest Herbarium's and is published under CC0. The Forest Herbarium sheet is listed in the article.
The locality field uses the label's spellings, Pah Dang and Geut Chang. The collector field uses the label form J.F. Maxwell. The long morphological note is summarised in the article.
Source discrepancies
- The label reads upper Gu Gahp Valley near Pah Dang (red Lahu) Village. The Academy's catalogue gives Gu Gan. The Forest Herbarium's gives red Lahn. The article follows the label.
These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 15:55, 18 September 2026 (+07)