Talk:RSC-IND-KER-0120150001-R1
More actions
Discussion for: RSC-IND-KER-0120150001-R1 • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The page rests on the archived versions of the RSC listing for Kerala of 19 August 2019, 30 January 2023 and 9 June 2023, and on the Kwik Seeds listing of the same line, which still describes the second generation. They establish that this seed was the second generation from the 2015 collection, reproduced ex situ through open pollination, and that RSC sold it until June 2023. They do not say where or in which year it was grown. No conservation priority is entered: a rating belongs to the collected population, at RSC-IND-KER-0120150001. Éloise 04:02, 18 September 2026 (+07)
Editorial treatment
- Accession ID.
RSC-IND-KER-0120150001-R1, the collection's ID with the reproduction suffix.-R2is the third generation, which was grown from this seed. - Sourcing type.
First generation reproduction: RSC counts the collection as the first generation and this seed as the second, so it is one reproduction removed from the collection. - Photographs. The four with RSC's 2019 captions naming the second generation are here. The infobox image and two gallery images say so directly; the early variant cut on 6 November in the Pacific Northwest was photographed in the same ex situ grows and under the same caption set.
- No coordinates. The listing does not say where the grow was made. The Idukki point describes the collection and stays on its page.
- Still sold by Kwik Seeds. Kwik Seeds describes its stock as the second generation, so this accession may still be on sale there. The wiki records what each listing says and does not infer which lot a shop holds. Éloise 04:02, 18 September 2026 (+07)
Descriptive name
The descriptive name now leads with the year and the holder's acronym: 2015 RSC Kerala Second-generation Reproduction, where it read Kerala Second-generation Reproduction 2015. Éloïse ruled on 17 September 2026 that a reproduction's descriptive name should carry the year first and name the reproducer, and it is applied to every reproduction in this corpus.
The acronym is the holder's, the same code the accession ID carries. It does not assert who conducted the grow-out: these listings name nobody, and the rule was given for a line whose reproducer the listing does not state either.
The page title is the accession ID and is unchanged, so no link breaks. Earlier entries on this page that quote the old name are left as they were written: they record what was decided then. Éloise 05:18, 18 September 2026 (+07)