Talk:COC-IND-UTT-0100000001
More actions
Discussion for: COC-IND-UTT-0100000001 • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The page rests on three Wayback captures of a single cocogenes.com listing (27 February 2021, 1 December 2022, 11 December 2024); the description body and short blurb are identical across all three, so only the earliest is cited. The listing carries no additional-information attribute table beyond a seed count — no stated aroma, effect, leaf shape or flowering time as a discrete field; the aroma and effect language entered in the article's Botanical Characteristics and Effects sections is drawn from the listing's descriptive prose, not a table. No collector, farmer, coordinate or village-level place is named. Tier A. Éloise 12:40, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Georeferencing
No coordinate is stated on any capture, so none is entered. The listing names only the Uttarkashi region and a route ("Bagtok to Yamunotri"), not a coordinate or a single settlement. Éloise 12:40, 23 September 2026 (+07)
"Wild-collected": attribution, not classification
The listing twice describes the material as wild: "Seeds collected in the wild from the region of Uttarkashi" in the body text, and "Wild cultivar from the Uttarkashi district" in the short blurb. This is the source's own word, not a claim independently verified here, and the template has no dedicated field for a wild/cultivated distinction. Per the lane brief, the article attributes "wild" to the listing throughout (e.g. "the listing describes the seed as...") rather than stating it in wiki voice as an established fact, and it is not used as a basis for any other field — autochtonous = Yes reflects the line being presented as an indigenous landrace, a separate question from whether this specific lot was collected from a cultivated planting or an unmanaged one, and is not upgraded into a formal "wild-collected" classification the source does not itself give. Éloise 12:40, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Editorial treatment
- Accession ID.
COC-IND-UTT-0100000001.COCfor Coco Genes;UTTis the established Uttarakhand code, reused (not minted). No month, season category or year is stated anywhere in the listing, so the ID takes0000andcollection_dateis blank. This page and COC-IND-UTT-0120210001 (Pilkholi) share theUTTcode but fall in different year buckets (0000vs.2021), so both take serial0001in their own bucket without colliding. - Admin 2. "Uttarkashi" entered as
admin_2(district); the listing calls it both a "region" and, in its short blurb, "the Uttarkashi district". - Bagtok not wikilinked. Named in prose as the listing spells it, but not linked: it is the more obscure of the two named points on the stated route, attested only in this one listing, and there is no independent basis to confirm the spelling or mint it as a place the wiki intends to cover. Yamunotri, the better-known pilgrimage site at the route's other end, is linked.
- "Yamunotri" spelling. The listing's short blurb spells it "Yamunotri" (the standard spelling); its description body separately spells the same word "yamotri". The article uses the standard spelling; both are the same listing, not a cross-source discrepancy.
Éloise 12:40, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Archived versions
Three Wayback captures were read: 27 February 2021, 1 December 2022 and 11 December 2024. The description body and short blurb are unchanged across all three; only the "related products" footer links and copyright year differ. Éloise 12:40, 23 September 2026 (+07)