Talk:COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1
More actions
Discussion for: COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1 • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The page rests on a single cocogenes.com listing, "Sister Villages : Kalga 2021", archived from 27 June 2022. It establishes that the seed on sale is a reproduction "from the 2020 seeds", grown in California by a named grower (Instagram handle @safeeakhfarms), and reuses the parent listing's place description verbatim. It does not say when in 2021 the grow-out happened, how many plants, or how many generations removed from the 2020 collection. No conservation priority is entered: per the lineage-split rule, a rating belongs to the collected population, at COC-IND-HIM-0120200001. Éloise 15:35, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Editorial treatment
- Accession ID.
COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1, the collection's own ID with the reproduction suffix, because Coco Genes is the same holder for both the 2020 collection and this 2021 reproduction (RULINGS/Naming_Convention_Reference_v1_1.md §8B: same-holder reproductions take a numbered suffix rather than a freestanding ID built from the reproduction's own facts). - Classification.
Landrace, notLandrace IBL: the listing calls this "a reproduction run from the 2020 seeds", not an inbred line, and no source calls it feral. This follows the live precedent atRSC-AFG-KAN-0120190001-R1, a same-holder reproduction with no inbreeding claimed, which likewise keepsclassification = Landrace. - Sourcing type. Left blank, matching the same precedent: the listing does not say how many generations separate this seed from the original 2020 collection, only that it is "a reproduction run", so no value is entered rather than assumed.
- No coordinates. The listing gives the same coordinate text as the parent listing, describing the collected population's place, not where the California grow-out happened. Per the lineage split, coordinates (recorded and, in this case, failed) belong on the collection's page only.
- Sample harvest date.
2021, from the site category the listing is filed under ("2021 season"), read as this specific reproduction batch's own year — distinct fromcollection_date, which stays empty because it would describe the original 2020 material and no source states an exact date for that either (see Talk:COC-IND-HIM-0120200001). - Country / province / locality. Carried over from the collected population (India, Himachal Pradesh, Kalga) rather than the grow-out's actual location, matching how the Kandahar reproduction precedent handles a reproduction grown far from the original site; California is described in prose (Production), not entered as a place field.
- Collector. Left blank, matching the collection page: neither an individual collector nor the grower @safeeakhfarms is entered in this field, since the field is understood in this corpus as naming the original collector of record, not the reproduction's grower. Éloise 15:35, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Links
Kalga (the village) is reused here from Talk:COC-IND-HIM-0120200001, where it was first minted and checked against the API on 23 September 2026. No new redlink is minted on this page. Éloise 15:35, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Descriptive name
2021 COC Kalga Reproduction: year first, then the holder's acronym, then the line, then "Reproduction" — following the naming rule already applied across this batch and the live corpus (see e.g. Talk:RSC-AFG-KAN-0120190001-R1). The year is 2021, this reproduction's own season, not 2020 (the parent collection's year) — a deliberate choice, since this batch has two attested years for the same lineage and the reproduction's descriptive name should identify the reproduction, not restate the parent's identity. Flagging this choice for Éloïse: the only live precedent (Kandahar) had a single available year, so this is a new situation, not a directly copied one. Éloise 15:35, 23 September 2026 (+07)