Jump to content
Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Since 7 October 2026 every request to landrace.wiki passes through Cloudflare, a security service brought in after a denial-of-service attack made the site unreachable. The Privacy policy now explains what this means for your data.

Research:2026-02-19/Journal article/cannabis-and-urban-livelihoods-illicit-opportunities-in-kenyas-towns-and-cities

From Landrace.wiki
Research record19 February 2026Journal article
Cannabis and urban livelihoods: Illicit opportunities in Kenya's towns and cities
International Journal of Drug Policy · 2026
An anthropological study of cannabis trading in Kenyan towns and cities, based on interviews and focus groups with 34 participants, 21 of them urban traders, and on participant observation. Traders describe the trade as accessible and profitable, with earnings put into other ventures and school fees, and name dealing with the police as their main difficulty, managed through relationships and bribes. The authors argue that illegality supports the value of cannabis against other informal work, and that urban livelihoods should be weighed alongside rural ones in debates on cannabis policy. It is an urban counterpart to the rural-producer studies in this corpus.
Record created 15 October 2026 · maintained by landrace.wiki editors · page history
Published19 Feb 2026
TypeJournal article
VenueInternational Journal of Drug Policy
Year2026
CountryKenya

2026-02-19 2026-10-15 Cannabis and urban livelihoods: Illicit opportunities in Kenya's towns and cities Journal article Geography Neil Carrier, Gordon Omenya International Journal of Drug Policy 2026 10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105194 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2026.105194 An anthropological study of cannabis trading in Kenyan towns and cities, based on interviews and focus groups with 34 participants, 21 of them urban traders, and on participant observation. Traders describe the trade as accessible and profitable, with earnings put into other ventures and school fees, and name dealing with the police as their main difficulty, managed through relationships and bribes. The authors argue that illegality supports the value of cannabis against other informal work, and that urban livelihoods should be weighed alongside rural ones in debates on cannabis policy. It is an urban counterpart to the rural-producer studies in this corpus. Kenya