Talk:Koelz 1665 (1931)
More actions
Discussion for: Koelz 1665 (1931) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The label's roadside habitat directly documents a ruderal plant and supports the Feral classification. It does not determine whether the population descended from cultivation or represented a longer-established local population. The sheets do not establish a named local variety, cultivation history, population continuity, a landrace, or a living germplasm holding. No conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
The label is headed Flora of Punjab, the specimen databases place Keshapur in Punjab, and one GBIF record adds Kulu. The added Kulu attribution conflicts with the stated 1,000-foot elevation and the surrounding Koelz collection sequence. The historical locality has not been securely mapped to a present-day state or district, so those fields and the coordinate remain blank. The label's 1,000 feet was converted to approximately 305 m for the infobox.
Editorial treatment
Catalogue 1414431 and catalogue 1414433 share Koelz's number 1665, month, locality and habitat and are treated as duplicate sheets from one gathering.
These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 17:46, 16 September 2026 (+07)