Talk:Bunchuai 30 (1966)
More actions
Discussion for: Bunchuai 30 (1966) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The label records the plant as common in a plantation, so it records cultivation. It gives no local name and no use. The gathering shows neither a continuing population nor a living germplasm holding, so it supports neither a landrace nor a feral classification. The accession is classified Other. No conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
The label names Phu Luang, a mountain, without an altitude. Naturalis georeferences the Leiden sheet to 17.12402, 101.50895, which reverse-geocodes to Phu Luang District and stands at 1,349 m on SRTM; the district field follows it. That point marks the mountain. The label gives no altitude to test it against. No coordinate is asserted, under the Tier C refusal of the coordinate ruling of 18 September 2026, which is the same call made for Nakkan 213 (1948) on Phu Kradueng and Bunchuai 1208 (1962) on Doi Chiang Dao.
Editorial treatment
The three sheets are one gathering: they carry the same printed label, number, date and accession number.
The accession is filed under the Leiden sheet because the three labels are identical and Leiden publishes its image under CC0; the Forest Herbarium publishes its images with all rights reserved. The two Forest Herbarium sheets are listed in the article.
The pencilled L K P C E AAH reads as the Index Herbariorum codes of Leiden, Kew, Paris, Copenhagen, Edinburgh and the Arnold Arboretum. Read that way, it lists the herbaria that received duplicates. Leiden's sheet is one of them. Only the letters are quoted in the article.
These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 15:53, 18 September 2026 (+07)