Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Ward 6218 (1967)

Discussion page of Ward 6218 (1967)
Talk

Discussion for: Ward 6218 (1967) • View • Links • Related changes

Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.

Page scope
Ward 6218 (1967) is an Accession — the atomic unit of documentation representing a specific collection event. All scientific data lives here.
Data verification
Check the main page for documentation tier status. Discuss coordinate accuracy, photo quality, or collection details here.

Discussion

Evidentiary scope

The field note records a single male plant on disturbed sand, attributed to a construction gang's rest site. It is a volunteer, not a stand, and a single plant on a single date. The catalogue gives a collector, a number, a date and a locality. It is a single gathering and shows neither a continuing population nor a living germplasm holding, so it supports neither a landrace nor a feral classification. The accession is classified Other. No conservation priority is assigned.

Edinburgh's sheet is a University of Natal card. The Bews Herbarium (NU) is largely undigitised, so its own copy of this gathering could not be looked for.

Georeferencing

BODATSA records the coordinate's accuracy as 50m, which marks a field reading. The square code 2930DD is carried alongside it in the database.

Editorial treatment

The KwaZulu-Natal Herbarium publishes no per-specimen page. Five permalink shapes were tried for a sheet of this batch and all answered 404, so the accession cites the database itself and the barcode identifies the sheet.

Source discrepancies

The label gives the position as 29 degrees 58 minutes south, 30 degrees 57 minutes east, which is about -29.967, 30.950. BODATSA's coordinate is -29.966667, 30.95, so the catalogue's point is the label's, converted. That makes this one of the few coordinates in the batch that came off a sheet rather than out of a gazetteer.

The habitat field says 15 to 20 ft and the altitude field says 5 m. Those agree.

These notes were recorded during accession preparation. Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 07:23, 24 September 2026 (+07)