Talk:Oral transmission of knowledge
More actions
Discussion for: Oral transmission of knowledge • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Sources
- Prain (1893), Report on the Cultivation and Use of Gánjá, is the account of a botanist who spent one season in the Naogaon tract. He describes the poddars from what cultivators told him and from the state of the fields, and says he did not see them at work.
- Chattopadhyaya (2026), Ganja Matters, is a history of cannabis in British India. It gives the terms parakdari and parakdar, the seasonal migration from Jessore and the hereditary character of the titles.
- Rahman and others (2023) record the Naogaon system from interviews with former growers, made more than 30 years after licensed cultivation ended in 1987. Page numbers are those of the journal.
- Chouvy and Afsahi (2014), Chouvy (2019) and Chouvy (2024) are geographical and sociological studies of Moroccan and world cannabis production, the first based on fieldwork in four Rif villages.
- Rubin and Comitas (1975), Ganja in Jamaica, rests on fieldwork in rural Jamaica in 1970–1972. Hamid (2002), The Ganja Complex, rests on fieldwork in Trinidad and New York.
- Stefanis, Ballas and Madianou (1975), in Cannabis and Culture, quote a Greek official statement on cultivation at Orchomenus.
- Openshaw (2002), Seeking Bauls of Bengal, is an ethnography of Bauls in West Bengal.
The names of the Bengal specialists
Prain calls the men who removed male plants poddars and "ganja doctors". Chattopadhyaya calls the work parakdari and the men parakdars, noting that poddar was a caste name and both were hereditary titles. Rahman and others use "ganja doctor". Whether every parakdar was a poddar by caste is not established by these sources.
Where Moroccan sieving came from
Chouvy and Afsahi (2014), following Robert Clarke's Hashish! (1998), think it most likely that threshing and sieving reached Morocco from Lebanon. A cannabis specialist they interviewed suggested, off the record, that Lebanese seed arrived with the technique; no published source confirms it.
Two figures for hand-rubbed charas
Chouvy and Afsahi (2014), citing Clarke, put the yield at 10 to 25 grams of hand-rubbed charas per collector in a full working day. Chouvy (2019) puts the best quality at about 5 grams a day, made by a slow, gentle rub that takes only the resin glands. The figures describe different grades and do not conflict.