Talk:Callaway s.n., Natal (1857)
More actions
Discussion for: Callaway s.n., Natal (1857) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
Kew's catalogue remark reads Branch of male plant in bud. Natal, S. Africa; received from Rev. Dr. Callaway, 1857, and the sheet is inscribed rec'd. from Revd. Dr. Callaway 1857. The year is the year the sheet was received. The plant came under the name Insango, and who gathered it is not recorded. Neither the label nor the catalogue gives a habitat, a use or a note on cultivation, so nothing shows whether the plant was cultivated, grew wild or had escaped. The accession is classified Unknown. It shows no continuing population and no living germplasm holding, and no conservation priority is assigned.
Georeferencing
No point is given. The sheet reads Natal, S. Africa: it names the colony of Natal as a whole, an area far larger than a district, and no place within it. The colony is the finest place named. An earlier version of this note said the same in fewer words.
Editorial treatment
The date is a receipt date and the accession carries the year alone. Kew's catalogue renders it as 1857-01-01 with day precision and flags its own rendering as padded. Writing a month or a day for this sheet would be inventing precision the source does not carry.
The province field is left empty: Natal as it stood in 1857 does not correspond to a present-day province, and the catalogue gives none.
Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 07:26, 24 September 2026 (+07)