Talk:CU-MN 20162542 (1968)
More actions
Discussion for: CU-MN 20162542 (1968) • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The museum's database gives the place as อ.พนัสนิคม จ.ชลบุรี (Phanat Nikhom, Chonburi), the collector as วิภา and colleagues and the date as 10 October 1968, and the habitat and soil as ดินเหนียว อากาศชื้น (clay soil, humid air). The entry names a kind of soil, not whether the plant was cultivated, grew wild or had escaped, and it records no use beyond the names the label carries. The published image is too small to read the label with confidence. The accession is classified Unknown. It is a single gathering and shows no continuing population and no living germplasm holding. No conservation priority is assigned.
The museum publishes one image of the sheet, about 560 by 800 px, and states no licence for it. It is shown here under fair use, with a rationale on the file page.
Georeferencing
The database's place is Phanat Nikhom, Chonburi, a district and a province, and no place within them. The district is georeferenced rather than declined: the infobox holds 13.45, 101.25, the point OpenStreetMap gives for the administrative area of Phanat Nikhom District. It is an area point for the district, not a collection point, and it places the gathering only to within about 25 km. This supersedes the refusal recorded here earlier, which declined a point.
Editorial treatment
The database gives the date in Thai, in the Buddhist Era. The article gives both forms. For these years the conversion is CE = BE - 543.
The database's collector field is ผู้จัดเก็บ, which covers both collecting and keeping. Where it lists several names, the infobox holds the first and the article quotes the whole string, as the wiki does for other multi-collector gatherings. Whether the names are of one person or several, and which are given names, was not established: Thai names in this database carry no comma between a given name and a surname, and the one sheet that does use a comma separates two people that way.
The page is titled by its catalogue number because the source gives no collector's number.
The collector field holds four given names, as the database gives them. They are likely a group of students; the database does not say so, and the page does not.
Source citations remain in the article. Éloise 17:23, 23 September 2026 (+07)