Talk:COC-IND-HIM-0120200001
More actions
Discussion for: COC-IND-HIM-0120200001 • View • Links • Related changes
Use this page for verification notes, disputes, and action items. Keep narrative content on the article.
Discussion
Evidentiary scope
The article rests on a single cocogenes.com listing ("Kalga | Parvati Valley"), archived from 16 January 2021; two later captures (27 June 2022, 24 April 2024) carry the same place description and are not separately cited. The same text is reused, word for word, on the 2021 reproduction listing ("Sister Villages : Kalga 2021"), drafted separately at COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1. Two Overgrow posts add a buyer's comment but no new facts about the collection itself. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Georeferencing
The listing states a coordinate, "31.2926° N, 77.9963° E".[1] Checked against OpenStreetMap on 23 September 2026 (reverse geocode of the stated point): the coordinate lies at Bhatwari, in the hamlet of Banwari, Chirgaon, Shimla district, Himachal Pradesh — about 94 km south-southeast of Kalga as OpenStreetMap places it (a hamlet within Pulga village, Bhuntar, Kullu district; forward-geocoded separately as node 756382656). This fails the OpenStreetMap check this batch's ruling sets (RULINGS_2026-09-23.md §3): the point lands in the wrong district entirely, about 94 km from the place named. Per that ruling, the coordinate is recorded here, verbatim and attributed, and the infobox coordinates field is left empty. elevation is entered as 2500 from the listing's stated altitude, which is not a coordinate and is not part of the failed check.
As background only, not used to correct the accession's own coordinate: OpenStreetMap places a hamlet named Kalga inside Pulga village, Bhuntar, Kullu district, at 31.9968, 77.4517 — consistent with the listing's own description of Kalga as reached via the Kheerganga pilgrimage route, and with Pulga's (this batch's separate accession) stated altitude and district. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Editorial treatment
- Accession ID.
COC-IND-HIM-0120200001. The listing states no collection date; it is filed under the site category "2020 Season". Per this batch's ruling (RULINGS_2026-09-23.md §5), the ID tail takes that year,2020, andcollection_datestays empty, because a shop season category is not a statement about when the seed was collected. - Locality.
Kalga, per the listing's own name. No district is stated on this listing (contrast Grahan and Pulga, which do state Kullu district);admin_2is left empty rather than inferred from neighbouring listings. - Collector. Left blank. The listing credits no individual, only village households collectively.
- Processing method.
Charas, from the listing's description of "handrubbed extracts from this region". - Related accession.
COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1, the 2021 California reproduction of this population; see Source collection below and RULINGS_2026-09-23.md's lineage-split rule. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Source collection
This page is the 2020-filed collection. Coco Genes' own site sells a reproduction of it, grown in California in 2021 and marketed as part of a "Sister Villages" series; it is now 2021 COC Kalga Reproduction. Per the lineage-split rule (`registry/Naming_Convention_Reference_v1_1.md` §8B; RULINGS_2026-09-23.md), the coordinate question above belongs on this page only — the reproduction carries no coordinate of its own. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Possible duplicate
No existing accession on this wiki carries locality = Kalga; this is a new place at the accession level. It should not be read as unrelated to the neighbouring, better-documented Pulga and Grahan material in this same batch — OpenStreetMap places a hamlet called Kalga inside Pulga village itself (see Georeferencing) — but nothing read for this batch states that Coco Genes' Kalga and Pulga lines are the same population, so they are drafted as separate accessions. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
Links
Kalga (the village itself, distinct from this accession page) is a new redlink minted here and reused on the reproduction page COC-IND-HIM-0120200001-R1; checked against the API on 23 September 2026 and confirmed missing. Éloise 15:20, 23 September 2026 (+07)
- ↑ Product listing, quoted in full in the article.