Landrace.Wiki - The Landrace Cannabis Wiki - Recent changes [en-gb]

Portal:Botany

Eloise Zomia — Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:46:28 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:46, 12 June 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Morocco

Eloise Zomia — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 14:59:40 GMT

Undo revision 12948 by Eloise Zomia (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:59, 11 June 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
(No difference)

Cannabis in Morocco

Eloise Zomia — Mon, 01 Jun 2026 06:44:23 GMT

Created page with "{{Page stub}} '''Cannabis in Morocco''' centres on the Rif of the north, the country's traditional ''kif'' cultivation zone and one of the longest-standing drug-type cannabis production landscapes still under farmer management.<ref name="ChouvyAfsahi2014">{{cite journal |last1=Chouvy |first1=Pierre-Arnaud |last2=Afsahi |first2=Kenza |title=Hashish revival in Morocco |journal=International Journal of Drug Policy |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=416–..."

New page

{{Page stub}}

'''Cannabis in Morocco''' centres on the [[Rif Mountains|Rif]] of the north, the country's traditional [[Kif|''kif'']] cultivation zone and one of the longest-standing drug-type cannabis production landscapes still under farmer management.<ref name="ChouvyAfsahi2014">{{cite journal |last1=Chouvy |first1=Pierre-Arnaud |last2=Afsahi |first2=Kenza |title=Hashish revival in Morocco |journal=International Journal of Drug Policy |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=416–423 |year=2014}}</ref>{{verify source}}

== History ==
{{Main|Régie des Tabacs et du Kif}}

{{Section stub}}

== Cultivation ==
{{Main|Cannabis in the Rif}}

{{Section stub}}

== Kif ==
{{Main|Kif}}

{{Section stub}}

== Hashish ==
{{Main|Hashish in Morocco}}

{{Section stub}}

== Riffian culture ==
{{Main|Cannabis in Riffian culture}}

{{Section stub}}

== Varieties and genetics ==

{{Section stub}}

== Trade ==

{{Section stub}}

== Legal status ==

{{Section stub}}

== Enforcement ==

{{Section stub}}

== Growing regions ==
{{#ask:
[[Category:Growing Regions]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has conservation status
|mainlabel=Region
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|default=No growing regions documented yet.
}}

== Growing areas ==
{{#ask:
[[Category:Growing Areas]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has growing region
|?Has conservation status
|mainlabel=Growing Area
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|default=No growing areas documented yet.
}}

== Accessions ==
{{#ask:
[[Category:Accessions]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has descriptive name=Name
|?Has conservation priority=Priority
|?Has collection date=Collected
|?Has growing area=Area
|mainlabel=Accession ID
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|sort=Has collection date
|order=desc
|default=No accessions documented yet.
}}

== Conservation status ==
{{Section stub}}

== Recent news ==
{{#ask:[[Category:News Item]][[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has event date=Date
|?Has admin subdivision 1=Province
|?Has event category=Category
|sort=Has event date
|order=desc
|limit=10
|format=broadtable
|class=wikitable sortable
|headers=plain
|mainlabel=Article
|default=No recent news items.
}}

== See also ==
* [[Morocco]]
* [[Cannabis in the Rif]]
* [[Rif Mountains]]
* [[Ketama]]
* [[Kif]]
* [[Hashish in Morocco]]
* [[Cannabis in Riffian culture]]
* [[Régie des Tabacs et du Kif]]
* [[Landrace cannabis]]

== References ==
<references />

Morocco

Eloise Zomia — Mon, 01 Jun 2026 05:10:02 GMT

Created page with "<!-- DRAFT SKELETON — Morocco (country page) — 2026-06-01 Structure mirrors the West Bengal model (general encyclopedic sections with the cannabis touch kept light, plus a Cannabis-in-X summary section that {{Main}}s to a separate hub) at country scale, using Cambodia's {{Infobox Country}}. Conventions applied (per the Morocco references, which override the Cambodia/WB examples where they diverge): - Sentence-case section headings only (editorial_style.md / wikitex..."

New page

{{Page stub}}
{{Country series}}
{{Infobox Country
|country_name = Morocco
|local_name = المغرب (al-Maghrib)
|image = 
|image_caption =
|flag = 
|capital = Rabat
|continent = Africa
|subregion = North Africa
|legal_status = Illegal (recreational)
|legal_status_class = illegal
|legal_status_year = 
|enforcement = 
|coordinates = 31.7917, -7.0926
}}

'''Morocco''' (Arabic: المغرب, ''al-Maghrib''; Tamazight: ⵍⵎⵖⵔⵉⴱ, ''Lmeɣrib'') is a country in the Maghreb region of North Africa, on the Atlantic and Mediterranean coasts. Its capital is [[Rabat]] and its largest city is [[Casablanca]].

The [[Rif Mountains|Rif]] of northern Morocco are the country's traditional [[Kif|''kif'']] cultivation zone and one of the longest-standing drug-type cannabis production landscapes still under farmer management.<ref name="ChouvyAfsahi2014">{{cite journal |last1=Chouvy |first1=Pierre-Arnaud |last2=Afsahi |first2=Kenza |title=Hashish revival in Morocco |journal=International Journal of Drug Policy |volume=25 |issue=3 |pages=416–423 |year=2014}}</ref>{{verify source}} The country's cannabis history, its ''hashish'' economy and the legal regime governing cultivation are treated at [[Cannabis in Morocco]].

== History ==

{{Section stub}}

== Geography ==

{{Section stub}}

== Demographics ==
{{Section stub}}

=== Population ===
{{Section stub}}

=== Languages ===

{{Section stub}}

=== Religion ===
{{Section stub}}

=== Ethnic groups ===

{{Section stub}}

== Economy ==

{{Section stub}}

== Cannabis in Morocco ==
{{Main|Cannabis in Morocco}}

{{Section stub}}

== Growing regions ==
{{#ask:
[[Category:Growing Regions]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has conservation status
|mainlabel=Region
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|default=No growing regions documented yet.
}}

== Growing areas ==
{{#ask:
[[Category:Growing Areas]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has growing region
|?Has conservation status
|mainlabel=Growing Area
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|default=No growing areas documented yet.
}}

== Accessions ==

=== Map ===

=== List ===
{{#ask:
[[Category:Accessions]]
[[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has descriptive name=Name
|?Has conservation priority=Priority
|?Has collection date=Collected
|?Has growing area=Area
|mainlabel=Accession ID
|format=table
|class=wikitable sortable
|sort=Has collection date
|order=desc
|default=No accessions documented yet.
}}

== Conservation status ==
{{Section stub}}

== Recent news ==
{{#ask:[[Category:News Item]][[Has country::Morocco]]
|?Has event date=Date
|?Has admin subdivision 1=Province
|?Has event category=Category
|sort=Has event date
|order=desc
|limit=10
|format=broadtable
|class=wikitable sortable
|headers=plain
|mainlabel=Article
|default=No recent news items.
}}

== See also ==
* [[Cannabis in Morocco]]
* [[Cannabis in the Rif]]
* [[Rif Mountains]]
* [[Ketama]]
* [[Kif]]
* [[Hashish in Morocco]]
* [[Cannabis in Riffian culture]]
* [[Régie des Tabacs et du Kif]]
* [[Landrace cannabis]]

== References ==
<references />

Ganja Mahal

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:49:10 GMT

Cultivation and manufacture

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 31 May 2026
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 22:		Line 22:

	=== The three-circle rotation ===		=== The three-circle rotation ===

			[[File:f06978db-1e34-4009-b155-d7bd2e96fac8.png\|thumb\|right\|280px\|alt= \|Rotational system as described by A. Rahman in his [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/377203550_Traditional_cultivation_and_the_production_system_of_Cannabis_by_the_Ganja_Society_in_Naogaon_Bangladesh paper] on the Ganja Mahal]]

	<templatestyles src="Data table/styles.css" />		<templatestyles src="Data table/styles.css" />
	<div class="lw-figure-right">		<div class="lw-figure-right">
Line 58:		Line 61:

	== Cultivation and manufacture ==		== Cultivation and manufacture ==
			{{Main\|Cannabis cultivation in the Ganja Mahal}}
	The standard description of cultivation derives from Hem Chunder Kerr's special report of 1877, which was carried almost verbatim into George Watt's economic dictionary and into the Commission's chapter on cultivation, and from O'Malley's 1916 account.<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877. Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref><ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Seed was raised in a nursery on high homestead land selected for good drainage, the cultivators using indicator plants to judge the suitability of the soil; the seedlings were transplanted into the fields, manured and tended through the cold season.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/> Before flowering the male plants were identified and pulled by a specialist, the ''poddar'' or ''parakdar'', known locally as the "ganja doctor," so that only the unfertilised female plants matured; the cultivators distinguished the female (''madi'') from the male (''morda'') but relied on the specialist's eye to tell them apart before flowering.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.69.1 "Studies on Ethnobotany of Folk Customs for Cannabis in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 69(1), 2025, pp. 1–8.</ref> Hired on three-month contracts and trained within their own families, these specialists were among the most highly paid workers in the tract, and some carried the technique abroad, helping to establish ''ganja'' cultivation in the Kathmandu and Butwal districts of Nepal.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms"/>		The standard description of cultivation derives from Hem Chunder Kerr's special report of 1877, which was carried almost verbatim into George Watt's economic dictionary and into the Commission's chapter on cultivation, and from O'Malley's 1916 account.<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877. Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref><ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Seed was raised in a nursery on high homestead land selected for good drainage, the cultivators using indicator plants to judge the suitability of the soil; the seedlings were transplanted into the fields, manured and tended through the cold season.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/> Before flowering the male plants were identified and pulled by a specialist, the ''poddar'' or ''parakdar'', known locally as the "ganja doctor," so that only the unfertilised female plants matured; the cultivators distinguished the female (''madi'') from the male (''morda'') but relied on the specialist's eye to tell them apart before flowering.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.69.1 "Studies on Ethnobotany of Folk Customs for Cannabis in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 69(1), 2025, pp. 1–8.</ref> Hired on three-month contracts and trained within their own families, these specialists were among the most highly paid workers in the tract, and some carried the technique abroad, helping to establish ''ganja'' cultivation in the Kathmandu and Butwal districts of Nepal.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms"/>

File:F06978db-1e34-4009-b155-d7bd2e96fac8.png

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:28:39 GMT

Eloise Zomia uploaded File:F06978db-1e34-4009-b155-d7bd2e96fac8.png

New page

Ganja Mahal

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:20:29 GMT

The three-circle rotation

@@ Line 47: / Line 47: @@
 |}
 <div class="lw-dtable-source">Source: Ganja Society 1918, Resolution book of Ganja society.</div>
 </div>

Template:Data table/styles.css

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:18:19 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:18, 31 May 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 68:		Line 68:
	float: right;		float: right;
	clear: right;		clear: right;
			width: 40%;
			max-width: 26em;
	margin: 0.3em 0 1em 1.6em;		margin: 0.3em 0 1em 1.6em;
	~~max-width: 55%;~~
	}		}
	@media (max-width: 720px) {		@media (max-width: 720px) {
	.lw-figure-right {		.lw-figure-right {
	float: none;		float: none;
			width: auto;
	max-width: none;		max-width: none;
	margin: 0.5em 0 1em;		margin: 0.5em 0 1em;
	}		}
			}

			.lw-figure-right .lw-dtable {
			width: 100%;
			}
			.lw-figure-right .lw-dtable-source {
			text-align: right;
	}		}

Ganja Mahal

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:04:07 GMT

The three-circle rotation

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:04, 31 May 2026
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 23:		Line 23:
	=== The three-circle rotation ===		=== The three-circle rotation ===
	<templatestyles src="Data table/styles.css" />		<templatestyles src="Data table/styles.css" />
			<div class="lw-figure-right">
	{\| class="lw-dtable"		{\| class="lw-dtable"
	\|+ <span class="lw-badge">Table 1</span>Total villages and number of farmers in three circles		\|+ <span class="lw-badge">Table 1</span>Total villages and number of farmers in three circles
Line 45:		Line 46:
	\| class="num" \| 7,740		\| class="num" \| 7,740
	\|}		\|}
	<div class="lw-dtable-source">Source: Ganja Society 1918, Resolution book of Ganja society~~, 1917–1918, reproduced in Rahman et al~~. ~~2023.<ref name="Rahman2023" />~~</div>		<div class="lw-dtable-source">Source: Ganja Society 1918, Resolution book of Ganja society.</div>

	{\| class="lw-dtable"		{\| class="lw-dtable"
Line 165:		Line 166:
	\|}		\|}
	<div class="lw-dtable-source">Source: Ganja Society 1978, Index of ganja license 1978–79, reproduced in Rahman et al. 2023.<ref name="Rahman2023" /></div>		<div class="lw-dtable-source">Source: Ganja Society 1978, Index of ganja license 1978–79, reproduced in Rahman et al. 2023.<ref name="Rahman2023" /></div>
			</div>

	The licensed area was worked on a rotational system. It was divided into three circles, and ''ganja'' could be grown in any one circle only once in three years, a scheme that limited the quantity in cultivation at any time, kept the active fields concentrated for inspection and rested the land between crops.<ref name="Rahman2023"/> The rotational structure is attested in the surviving cooperative records and in interviews with the last generation of cultivators, and the division into circles was later carried into the cooperative's governance, each circle electing its own representatives to the managing committee.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, [https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/107915 "Naogaon and the world: Intoxication, commoditisation, and imperialism in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1840–1940,"] PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.</ref> The three circles took their names from their central villages, Muradpur, Kirtipur and Gobindapur, and were named both in O'Malley's gazetteer, where one Excise Sub-Inspector was assigned to each, and in the cooperative's own founding records.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/>		The licensed area was worked on a rotational system. It was divided into three circles, and ''ganja'' could be grown in any one circle only once in three years, a scheme that limited the quantity in cultivation at any time, kept the active fields concentrated for inspection and rested the land between crops.<ref name="Rahman2023"/> The rotational structure is attested in the surviving cooperative records and in interviews with the last generation of cultivators, and the division into circles was later carried into the cooperative's governance, each circle electing its own representatives to the managing committee.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, [https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/107915 "Naogaon and the world: Intoxication, commoditisation, and imperialism in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1840–1940,"] PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.</ref> The three circles took their names from their central villages, Muradpur, Kirtipur and Gobindapur, and were named both in O'Malley's gazetteer, where one Excise Sub-Inspector was assigned to each, and in the cooperative's own founding records.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/>

Template:Data table/styles.css

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 07:02:06 GMT

@@ Line 63: / Line 63: @@
 	font-size: 0.82em;
 	color: #5a6650;
+}

Ganja Mahal

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 06:59:25 GMT

The three-circle rotation

Show changes

Template:Data table/styles.css

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 06:56:57 GMT

Created page with ".lw-dtable { border-collapse: collapse; margin: 0.5em 0 0.3em; background: #ffffff; border: 1px solid #e1e6df; font-size: 0.95em; line-height: 1.45; } .lw-dtable caption { text-align: left; margin-bottom: 6px; color: #1a2612; font-weight: bold; } .lw-dtable caption .lw-badge { display: inline-block; margin-right: 8px; padding: 3px 10px; background: #2d5016; color: #ffffff; font-size: 0.78em; font-weight: bold; letter-spacing: 0.06em; border-radius: 3px..."

New page

.lw-dtable {
border-collapse: collapse;
margin: 0.5em 0 0.3em;
background: #ffffff;
border: 1px solid #e1e6df;
font-size: 0.95em;
line-height: 1.45;
}
.lw-dtable caption {
text-align: left;
margin-bottom: 6px;
color: #1a2612;
font-weight: bold;
}
.lw-dtable caption .lw-badge {
display: inline-block;
margin-right: 8px;
padding: 3px 10px;
background: #2d5016;
color: #ffffff;
font-size: 0.78em;
font-weight: bold;
letter-spacing: 0.06em;
border-radius: 3px;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.lw-dtable th {
background: #2d5016;
color: #ffffff;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: left;
padding: 9px 14px;
}
.lw-dtable td {
padding: 7px 14px;
color: #34402d;
border-bottom: 1px dotted #d7e0d2;
}
.lw-dtable .num {
text-align: right;
}
.lw-dtable .group {
color: #2d5016;
font-weight: bold;
vertical-align: top;
border-right: 1px solid #e1e6df;
}
.lw-dtable .subtotal td {
background: #eef3ea;
color: #2d5016;
font-weight: bold;
border-top: 1px solid #cfe0c8;
border-bottom: 1px solid #cfe0c8;
}
.lw-dtable .total td {
background: #2d5016;
color: #ffffff;
font-weight: bold;
border: 0;
}
.lw-dtable-source {
margin: 0 0 1em;
font-size: 0.82em;
color: #5a6650;
}

Cannabis in Cooch Behar State

Eloise Zomia — Sun, 31 May 2026 03:24:17 GMT

Created page with "The history of '''cannabis in Cooch Behar State''' covers the cultivation, consumption, trade and regulation of cannabis in the princely state of Cooch Behar, a feudatory state of British India in the north Bengal sub-Himalaya, from the later nineteenth century until the state's merger into West Bengal in 1950. The state regulated cannabis under its own Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878, operating a licensed excise s..."

New page

The history of '''cannabis in Cooch Behar State''' covers the cultivation, consumption, trade and regulation of cannabis in the princely state of [[Cooch Behar State|Cooch Behar]], a feudatory state of British India in the north Bengal sub-Himalaya, from the later nineteenth century until the state's merger into [[West Bengal]] in 1950. The state regulated cannabis under its own [[Cooch Behar Excise Act 1878|Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878]], operating a licensed excise system that drew its structure from the Bengal Presidency model but distributed ganja through state-run warehouses, the ''golahs'', rather than through the caste-managed contractor system used in the directly administered districts.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92">Cooch Behar State, [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.32324 ''General Administration Report of the Cooch Behar State for 1891-92''], Cooch Behar State Press, Cooch Behar, 1893, §§45, 58.</ref>

Cannabis grew wild across the territory as a weed of the sub-Himalayan belt, and ganja and bhang were in customary use among the [[Rajbanshi people|Rajbanshi]] cultivating community and the Bengali Muslim settlers of the southern parganas.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch3-Coochbehar">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I, ch. III, §§28, 34.</ref><ref name="Hunter1876-X">Hunter, W.W., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.37646 ''A Statistical Account of Bengal, Volume X: Districts of Darjiling and Jalpaiguri and the State of Kuch Behar''], Trübner & Co., London, 1876.</ref> Commercial cultivation was prohibited within the state, which procured its ganja by import from the Bengal Presidency [[Ganja Mahal]] in neighbouring Rajshahi and issued it for retail from the sub-divisional golahs.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch4-Coochbehar">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I, ch. IV, §95.</ref> The system tracked the Bengal Presidency on rates and procedure, returned a steady minor revenue and operated for some seven decades without significant public-order disturbance.

Cooch Behar acceded to the Indian Union in 1949 and merged into West Bengal as Cooch Behar district in 1950, when its excise law was assimilated to the Bengal-derived Indian framework and the 1878 Act was superseded.<ref name="CoochBeharAssim1950">''The Cooch Behar (Assimilation of State Laws) Act, 1950''.</ref> The simple homestead agronomy of the state's cultivator population is the substrate from which the surviving landrace cannabis populations of the present Cooch Behar district descend.

== Background ==

Cooch Behar emerged from the partition of the Kamata kingdom of the Koch dynasty after the death of Nara Narayan in 1586, and the western successor state weathered Mughal pressure in the seventeenth century and Bhutanese incursions in the eighteenth. In 1772 Bhutanese forces captured the raja and installed a regent, and the Nazir Deo applied to the [[East India Company]] for military assistance. A defensive treaty concluded on 5 April 1773 extinguished Bhutanese suzerainty and reduced Cooch Behar to a feudatory state of the Company. Internal administration, including taxation, law and excise, remained with the maharaja, while external affairs and defence passed to the Company and later to the Crown, mediated from 1865 by a Political Agent who was ex officio the Commissioner of the Rajshahi Division.

Two features of this inheritance bear on the cannabis question. The territory sat within the sub-Himalayan belt where ''Cannabis sativa'' grows spontaneously as a vigorous weed of disturbed ground around homesteads, river banks and cattle stands, a placement the [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] of 1893 to 1894 recorded without qualification.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch3-Coochbehar"/> The cultivating population, dominated by the Rajbanshi community alongside Bengali Muslim settlers in the southern parganas adjoining [[Rangpur]], used ganja and bhang as part of the wider north Bengal cultural complex described by Francis Buchanan-Hamilton in his survey of Rangpur of 1809 to 1810 and reproduced in Hunter's statistical account.<ref name="Hunter1876-X"/><ref name="Risley1891-Kochh">Risley, H.H., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.42709 ''Tribes and Castes of Bengal: Ethnographic Glossary, Volume I''], Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1891, p. 493, entry "Kochh".</ref> No record survives of a formal pre-1773 Koch monopoly on cannabis; consumption was governed by custom, by sectarian use among the Shaiva mendicants attached to the Madan Mohan and Baneshwar shrines and by routine household use of bhang at festivals.

== The Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878 ==

The state's cannabis regime rested on the Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878, enacted as Cooch Behar Act VIII of 1878 and cited in the state's records as "Act VIII B.C. of 1878".<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/> It was promulgated during the minority of Maharaja Nripendra Narayan, who had succeeded as an infant in 1863 and assumed ruling powers in 1883. The Act was drafted under the British commissioner then administering the state on his behalf, Colonel J. C. Haughton, who also oversaw the land revenue resettlement. It drew its structure closely from the Bengal Excise Act of 1878 (Bengal Council Act VII of 1878), from which it is nonetheless to be distinguished, and was subsequently revised by Cooch Behar Act I of 1883 to align enforcement with the Bengal reforms of that year.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/>

No printed full text of the Act has been located in the digitised public collections, and its provisions are reconstructed from the operational references in the state's annual administration reports, from the Bengal Excise Act parallels and from the schedule of surviving Cooch Behar Acts catalogued at merger.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94">Cooch Behar State, ''Annual Administration Report of the Cooch Behar State, 1893-94'', §§21, 40, 65.</ref> The Act defined the excisable articles to include country spirit, foreign liquor, opium, ganja, bhang or ''siddhi'' and charas on the Bengal model; provided for state licensing of the manufacture, possession, transport and retail sale of those articles, with state-direct rather than caste-managed wholesale; and established the system of state golahs for the storage and issue of ganja. Duty was set by notification rather than by the primary text, which allowed the maharaja in council to harmonise rates with British India: the state's ganja duty was raised in step with the Bengal increase from 3 February 1894.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94"/> A notification modelled on section 17A of the Bengal Act prohibited the import of any excisable article into the state without an authorised licence, a measure aimed at the spirit and ganja smuggling that ran with the neighbouring British districts.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94"/> After the 1883 revision, section 41 of the Act vested the state's police with the powers of excise officers, a provision the 1891-92 administration report records being brought into effect that year.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/> The Act remained the operative excise law of the state until 1949.

== The state golah system ==

The distinguishing structural feature of the Cooch Behar system was its state-direct wholesale through state golahs. The Bengal Presidency excise system ran on a licensed wholesale model in which ganja from the central Naogaon golah was released to district gola-walla contractors who held the wholesale right by auction, the retail layer drawing predominantly on specific trading communities. Cooch Behar did not auction wholesale rights to private contractors. Its golahs were state-run warehouses managed by the sub-divisional Naib Ahilkars under the Dewan, with the Fouzdary Ahilkar holding magisterial excise jurisdiction, and retail was licensed at the level of the individual shop while the state retained the wholesale margin directly.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/>

By the 1880s the state was divided into four revenue and excise sub-divisions, the Sudder headquarters at Cooch Behar town, Dinhata, Mathabhanga and Mekliganj, each operating a golah for ganja storage and issue; Tufanganj was added later as a fifth, and Sitalkuchi, Sitai and Haldibari operated as outlying retail points dependent on the sub-divisional golahs.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/> The administration reports record the routine management of the system: the 1891-92 report sanctions the writing-off of ganja found short in the golahs across the sub-divisions and the destruction of refuse ganja found unfit for use, and it lists the Ganja Golah at the Sudder among the state's buildings.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/>

Because cultivation was prohibited within the state, the golahs were supplied by import. The state procured its ganja from the Bengal Presidency Ganja Mahal in Rajshahi through its import-licensing regime and stored it at the sub-divisional golahs for retail issue, the wild and homestead growth so prevalent in the territory being suppressed, imperfectly, by the excise establishment.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch4-Coochbehar"/> Because the licence-holder was any qualified subject who could pay the fee rather than a member of a contractor caste, the state-direct system left more room for Rajbanshi and Bengali Muslim retail licensees than the contractor-managed trade of the adjoining British districts of Jalpaiguri and Rangpur.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/>

== Cultivation and the cultivator population ==

Cooch Behar did not licence the cultivation of ganja as a commercial crop. The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission recorded the position plainly:
{{Quote|Cultivation of the hemp plant is prohibited in the State of Kuch Behar, and it is probable that secret cultivation is only carried on to the same extent as in the surrounding British territory.|''Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission'' (1894), Vol. I, ch. IV, §95}}
The state's own memorandum to the Commission described the corresponding wild growth, the Commission summarising it to the effect that wild hemp grew spontaneously in most parts of the state, which lay within the belt of sub-Himalayan growth.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch3-Coochbehar"/>

The state was overwhelmingly agrarian, the 1901 census recording some 567,000 persons and the 1941 census some 641,000, more than ninety-five per cent of them rural. The Rajbanshi community was the historic cultivating community of the Koch heartland and remained the largest single group, with Bengali Muslim cultivators concentrated in the southern parganas. The Rajbanshi were not licensed ganja cultivators, since cultivation was prohibited, but they were the principal consumers of state-issued ganja and bhang and the principal source of the unlicensed homestead growth the excise establishment had to suppress.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch4-Coochbehar"/> The chasi cultivator community of the Rajshahi Ganja Mahal was a distinct Bengali Muslim group of the Naogaon area and did not form a meaningful element of the Cooch Behar cultivator base, so that where unlicensed cultivation occurred in the state it followed not the intensively staked and pruned commercial chasi method of Rajshahi but the simple homestead-plot agronomy of north Bengal. That homestead agronomy is the substrate from which the contemporary Cooch Behar landrace cannabis populations descend.

== Revenue ==

Cannabis was a consistent but minor element of the state's revenue, well below land revenue and generally below country spirit duty. The administration report for the half-year ending October 1883 records ganja duty and ganja licence fees of roughly Rs. 12,000 within an excise total of roughly Rs. 33,000, country spirit and opium being comparable items, while bhang licence fees stood at only a few hundred rupees, indicating a much smaller licensed bhang trade than ganja even as unlicensed bhang use from wild plants remained widespread; ganja consumption that half-year was around 70 maunds, having fallen from a peak of about 92 maunds in 1877-78.<ref name="CoochBehar1883">Cooch Behar State, ''Annual Administration Report of the Cooch Behar State'' (half-year ending October 1883), §§32-35.</ref> The 1894 enhancement brought the state's rates into line with the Bengal duty on flat ganja.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94"/> Toward the end of the colonial period the state's cannabis revenue drifted downward in step with the all-India contraction of licensed ganja sales, the administration report for 1934-35 recording falling ganja duty against rising outstill revenue.<ref name="CoochBehar1934-35">Cooch Behar State, ''Annual Administration Report of the Cooch Behar State, 1934-35''.</ref> Across the period the import-prohibition and the parallel rates were designed to prevent the arbitrage smuggling that the reports record running in both directions with the surrounding British districts.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94"/>

== The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission ==

The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission did not sit in the princely states, on the Governor-General's instruction that there were political objections to its holding sittings in native states although information on them comparable to that gathered for British India should be included.<ref name="IHDC1894-I">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I.</ref> Cooch Behar was accordingly not visited but supplied a written memorandum: at the request of the Government of Bengal, the state's Superintendent, the Dewan, the Civil and Sessions Judge and the Fouzdary Ahilkar framed answers to the Commission's written questions, and the information was forwarded to its Secretary.<ref name="CoochBehar1893-94"/> The resulting memorandum was printed in the Appendices of Volume III of the Commission's report.<ref name="IHDC1894-III">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://digital.nls.uk/indiapapers/browse/archive/74908458 ''Report''], 1894, vol. III, "Appendices, Miscellaneous." (Wellcome/NLS scan, archive identifier b32222920_0003.)</ref> Read against the Commission's findings for the Bengal Presidency, its picture of Cooch Behar is unremarkable: a working licensed excise system tracking the Bengal model, no significant local commercial cultivation and wild growth typical of the sub-Himalayan belt that posed ordinary enforcement problems but no exceptional concern.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch4-Coochbehar"/>

== Partition and merger, 1947 to 1950 ==

Cooch Behar did not accede to either dominion at the [[Partition of India|Partition]] of August 1947. The maharaja signed an Instrument of Accession to the Indian Union on 28 August 1949, administration was transferred to the Government of India on 12 September 1949 and the state was merged into West Bengal on 19 January 1950, when it became Cooch Behar district. The excise transition was effected by three instruments of 1950: the Cooch Behar (Assimilation of State Laws) Act, which catalogued the surviving Cooch Behar Acts and either repealed, amended or assimilated them to West Bengal law; the West Bengal State Laws (Extension to Cooch Behar) Act, which extended the Bengal Excise Act of 1909 to the merged territory; and the Opium and Revenue Laws (Extension of Application) Act, which extended the central revenue laws.<ref name="CoochBeharAssim1950"/><ref name="OpiumRevenueExt1950">''The Opium and Revenue Laws (Extension of Application) Act, 1950'' (Act No. 33 of 1950).</ref> The Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878 was thereby superseded after seventy-two years of continuous operation, and the state golah system was wound up in the early 1950s. Licensed ganja sale continued in West Bengal until the [[Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985|NDPS Act of 1985]] ended licensed ganja vend in the state, while licensed bhang vend continued under the West Bengal excise regime that descends in part from the Bengal Presidency framework into which the Cooch Behar system was assimilated.<ref name="NDPSAct1985">[https://www.indiacode.nic.in/handle/123456789/1791 ''The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985''] (Act No. 61 of 1985), sections 2(iii) and 8.</ref>

== Legacy ==

The historic territory of the state now forms the Cooch Behar district of West Bengal together with parts of Alipurduar district, and the Dinhata, Mathabhanga and Mekliganj sub-divisions of the present district descend directly from the sub-divisions in which the golah system operated. Cannabis cultivation in the territory is now illegal under the NDPS Act and is the subject of recurrent enforcement along the Indo-Bangladesh border and in the interior.<ref name="NDPSAct1985"/><ref name="PIB2025-BSFNCB">[https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=2143449 "BSF-NCB joint operation seizes 473 Kg Ganja at Indo-Bangladesh border,"] Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 8 July 2025.</ref> The surviving landrace cannabis populations of the district, documented by the Zomia Collective's WEB01 field accessions, are the agronomic legacy of the pre-prohibition north Bengal homestead cultivation complex, and the Rajbanshi cultural relationship to cannabis that the state's consumption record attests is treated more fully in [[Cannabis in Rajbanshi culture]].

== Documentary record ==

The English-language record of the Cooch Behar cannabis system is thin. The principal published sources are the run of Cooch Behar State annual administration reports, of which the 1891-92 report is the earliest readily available with cannabis excise material, and Volume I of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission report.<ref name="CoochBehar1891-92"/><ref name="IHDC1894-I"/> Two documents remain the principal lacunae: the full text of the Cooch Behar Excise Act of 1878 and its 1883 revision, not located in any digitised collection, and the state's memorandum to the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission in the Appendices of Volume III, not yet retrieved in full.<ref name="IHDC1894-III"/> A complete year-by-year compilation of the state's ganja and bhang revenue, consumption and licence figures from the full run of administration reports between 1872 and 1949 remains to be assembled, as do the relevant passages of Khan Choudhury Amanatulla Ahmed's standard Bengali history ''Cooch Beharer Itihas'' (1936) and of Charu Chandra Sanyal's ''The Rajbansis of North Bengal'' (1965).

== See also ==
* [[Ganja Mahal]] – the licensed Bengal Presidency cultivation tract that supplied the state's ganja
* [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]] – the wider licit trade of which the state's imports formed part
* [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] – the 1893–94 colonial inquiry to which the state submitted a memorandum
* [[Cannabis in West Bengal]] – the regional overview of which this article is a part
* [[Cannabis in Rajbanshi culture]] – the cultural tradition of the state's principal community
* [[Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi (1916)]] – the gazetteer of the supplying tract, which records the export of Naogaon ganja to Cooch Behar

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Cannabis and Colonialism]]

Bengal Presidency cannabis trade

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 18:04:08 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:04, 31 May 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<!-- ~~DRAFT — Bengal Presidency cannabis trade — landrace~~.~~wiki West Bengal cluster~~		[[File:Naogaon-ganja-society-01.jpg\|thumb\|right\|280px\|alt= Headquarters of the Ganja Society in Naogaon \| Headquarters of the [[Naogaon]] [[Ganja Society]]]]
	~~Sibling~~ of ~~Ganja Mahal /~~ Ganja Society ~~/ Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, drawing on the~~
	~~colonial dossier (Cannabis~~ in ~~Bengal Presidency under Colonial Rule, 1790–1947).~~
	~~Wikitext below~~ the ~~marker. Infobox deferred (sibling-set convention). Deployment Éloïse's. -->~~

	'''Bengal Presidency cannabis trade''' refers to the licensed, excise-regulated commerce in [[Cannabis\|cannabis]] preparations - [[Ganja\|ganja]], [[Bhang\|bhang]] and [[Charas\|charas]] - across the [[Bengal Presidency]] under [[East India Company]] and Crown rule, from the consolidation of Company authority in the late eighteenth century to [[Partition of India\|Partition]] in 1947. From the 1790s the colonial state taxed cannabis through a licensing system inherited from Mughal-era abkari (excise) practice, and over the nineteenth century it confined licensed cultivation to a single small tract in northern Bengal, the [[Ganja Mahal]] around [[Naogaon]], while the manufactured product was distributed and consumed across the Presidency and beyond.<ref name="Mills2003">Mills, James H., [https://archive.org/details/cannabisbritanni0000mill ''Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928''], Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.</ref><ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.66.21 "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref>		'''Bengal Presidency cannabis trade''' refers to the licensed, excise-regulated commerce in [[Cannabis\|cannabis]] preparations - [[Ganja\|ganja]], [[Bhang\|bhang]] and [[Charas\|charas]] - across the [[Bengal Presidency]] under [[East India Company]] and Crown rule, from the consolidation of Company authority in the late eighteenth century to [[Partition of India\|Partition]] in 1947. From the 1790s the colonial state taxed cannabis through a licensing system inherited from Mughal-era abkari (excise) practice, and over the nineteenth century it confined licensed cultivation to a single small tract in northern Bengal, the [[Ganja Mahal]] around [[Naogaon]], while the manufactured product was distributed and consumed across the Presidency and beyond.<ref name="Mills2003">Mills, James H., [https://archive.org/details/cannabisbritanni0000mill ''Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928''], Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.</ref><ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.66.21 "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref>
Line 9:		Line 6:

	== Pre-monopoly trade, c.1722–1789 ==		== Pre-monopoly trade, c.1722–1789 ==

			[[File:Ganja-mahala-1894.jpg\|thumb\|right\|280px\|alt= ‘Gathering the Ganja Crop’ in the Ganja Mahal, Naogaon, East Bengal, now Bangladesh. \| ‘Gathering the Ganja Crop’ in the Ganja Mahal, Naogaon, East Bengal, now Bangladesh. A photo from the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission (1894).]]

	The earliest written notice of cannabis cultivation in Bengal identified in colonial records dates from 1722, when the East India Company conducted experimental trials of hemp as a fibre crop.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> James H. Mills describes a divided late-eighteenth-century Company interest: a sustained but unsuccessful attempt by the [[William Roxburgh\|Calcutta Botanic Garden]] to grow European-style fibre hemp on the Bengal plain, and a parallel willingness to tax the existing peasant trade in narcotic ganja.<ref name="Mills2003"/>		The earliest written notice of cannabis cultivation in Bengal identified in colonial records dates from 1722, when the East India Company conducted experimental trials of hemp as a fibre crop.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> James H. Mills describes a divided late-eighteenth-century Company interest: a sustained but unsuccessful attempt by the [[William Roxburgh\|Calcutta Botanic Garden]] to grow European-style fibre hemp on the Bengal plain, and a parallel willingness to tax the existing peasant trade in narcotic ganja.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

File:Naogaon-ganja-society-01.jpg

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 18:01:57 GMT

Eloise Zomia uploaded File:Naogaon-ganja-society-01.jpg Headquarters of the Ganja Society in Naogaon

New page

== Summary ==
Headquarters of the Ganja Society in Naogaon
== Licensing ==
{{Fair-use}}

Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923)

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 17:14:41 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:14, 31 May 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|title_english =		\|title_english =
	\|title_latin =		\|title_latin =
	\|image = Gazetteer-pabna-1923.~~jpg~~		\|image = Gazetteer-pabna-1923.png
	\|image_caption =		\|image_caption =
	\|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]		\|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]
Line 30:		Line 30:
	}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1923. It is one of the volumes of the Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes the district of [[Pabna]], which the gazetteer dates as a separate charge from 1828; the district lay in the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923. Page references in this article follow the 1923 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>		}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1923. It is one of the volumes of the Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes the district of [[Pabna]], which the gazetteer dates as a separate charge from 1828; the district lay in the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923. Page references in this article follow the 1923 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>

	The gazetteer ~~is not a cultivation source in~~ the ~~manner of the lowland Bengal ganja surveys~~.~~{{definition by negation}}~~ Its ~~only direct cannabis content is the~~ chapter on ~~'''~~General Administration~~''', whose~~ excise subsection ~~records~~ the district's ganja revenue for 1919–20 (pp. 95–96)~~; the~~ agricultural statistics ~~separately~~ return ~~acreage under '''~~sunn hemp~~'''~~, the ~~unrelated~~ fibre legume, among the district's crops.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>{{definition by negation}} Unlike O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer, which gives the [[Ganja Mahal\|ganja mahal]] a chapter of its own, and unlike the Santal Parganas volume, which records the ascetic ganja use of the Sapha Har, the Pabna gazetteer treats cannabis incidentally and only on the consumption side.{{definition by negation}}		The gazetteer records cannabis on the revenue and consumption side. Its chapter on General Administration carries an excise subsection setting out the district's ganja revenue for 1919–20, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country spirits (pp. 95–96), and its agricultural statistics return sunn hemp, the fibre legume, among the district's crops.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

	== Composition and publication ==		== Composition and publication ==
Line 42:		Line 42:
	The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the majority of the Bengal District Gazetteers: Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Natural Calamities, Agriculture, Industries Labour and Trade, Means of Communication, Land Revenue Administration and the General Administration of the district, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The History chapter dates the district's creation as a separate charge to 1828 and treats the agrarian disturbances of 1873; the People chapter draws on the census of 1921.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>		The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the majority of the Bengal District Gazetteers: Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Natural Calamities, Agriculture, Industries Labour and Trade, Means of Communication, Land Revenue Administration and the General Administration of the district, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The History chapter dates the district's creation as a separate charge to 1828 and treats the agrarian disturbances of 1873; the People chapter draws on the census of 1921.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

	~~The cannabis-relevant material sits in two chapters.~~ The chapter on '''General Administration''' ~~contains~~ the excise subsection~~, where~~ the district's intoxicant revenue ~~is tabulated~~ (pp. 95–96).<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The '''Agriculture''' chapter returns ~~acreage under~~ the district's fibre ~~crops~~, ~~where~~ sunn hemp ~~is listed and named~~.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>{{relevance}} The volume carries no dedicated cultivation account of drug cannabis and, unlike the Rajshahi and Santal Parganas gazetteers, no religious or ethnographic cannabis material.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916, ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144.</ref>{{repetitive}}		The chapter on '''General Administration''' carries the volume's cannabis material, in an excise subsection that tabulates the district's intoxicant revenue (pp. 95–96).<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The '''Agriculture''' chapter separately returns the district's fibre acreage, sunn hemp among it.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

	== Cannabis in the text ==		== Cannabis in the text ==
Line 50:		Line 50:
	The excise subsection of the General Administration chapter tabulates the district's excise revenue for the year 1919–20. The aggregate was Rs. 2,22,000, representing an incidence of 2 annas 5 pies per head of the population; of this, the larger share came from hemp drugs:		The excise subsection of the General Administration chapter tabulates the district's excise revenue for the year 1919–20. The aggregate was Rs. 2,22,000, representing an incidence of 2 annas 5 pies per head of the population; of this, the larger share came from hemp drugs:
	{{Quote\|Of this sum Rs. 83,000 were derived from country spirits and Rs. 1,12,000 from hemp drugs, mainly gánja.\|''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna'' (1923), pp. 95–96}}		{{Quote\|Of this sum Rs. 83,000 were derived from country spirits and Rs. 1,12,000 from hemp drugs, mainly gánja.\|''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna'' (1923), pp. 95–96}}
	Hemp drugs thus out-earned country spirits in the district.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer records average consumption of half a gallon of country spirit and one-sixth of a seer of hemp drugs for every hundred persons, and gives the density of licensed shops as one hemp-drug shop to every 8 square miles in the urban areas of the district and one to every 54 square miles in the rural areas, against 20 country-spirit shops in all.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The figures describe a consumption district immediately south of the licensed cultivation tract; ~~the gazetteer does not describe~~ the wholesale or warehouse arrangements ~~of the trade, which~~ belong to the Rajshahi and Naogaon record.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>		Hemp drugs thus out-earned country spirits in the district.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer records average consumption of half a gallon of country spirit and one-sixth of a seer of hemp drugs for every hundred persons, and gives the density of licensed shops as one hemp-drug shop to every 8 square miles in the urban areas of the district and one to every 54 square miles in the rural areas, against 20 country-spirit shops in all.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The figures describe the retail end of the trade in a consumption district immediately south of the licensed cultivation tract; the wholesale and warehouse arrangements that supplied it belong to the Rajshahi and Naogaon record.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916, ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144.</ref>

	=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===		=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===

	The agricultural statistics return the district's fibre acreage as jute, some 126,000 acres, and '''sunn hemp''', some 29,000 acres.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer ~~is explicit that~~ this is sunn hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), ~~the~~ fibre legume ~~unrelated to ''Cannabis sativa'', describing it as~~ raised in the winter season and ploughed into the ground as a green manure for the following jute crop.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> ~~Because the volume names the~~ sunn hemp ~~directly rather than returning~~ an ~~undifferentiated "hemp", the acreage carries none of the ambiguity~~ that ~~attaches to~~ the ~~"hemp" returns of some other Bengal district gazetteers,~~ and ~~is not evidence of~~ drug-cannabis ~~cultivation~~.~~{{relevance}}{{definition by negation}}~~		The agricultural statistics return the district's fibre acreage as jute, some 126,000 acres, and '''sunn hemp''', some 29,000 acres.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer identifies this crop as sunn hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), a fibre legume raised in the winter season and ploughed into the ground as a green manure for the following jute crop.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The 29,000-acre return is therefore a fibre-crop figure. By naming sunn hemp explicitly the gazetteer settles an entry that colonial Bengal crop statistics often leave ambiguous between the fibre legume and drug cannabis.

	== Significance for landrace documentation ==		== Significance for landrace documentation ==

	The gazetteer~~'s value to the documentation of South Asian cannabis is~~ consumption-side ~~rather than agricultural.{{definition by negation}}{{llm}} Its excise figures give a quantified retail picture~~ for a district ~~on the southern edge~~ of ~~the Bengal cannabis world, immediately below~~ the licensed cultivation tract, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country ~~liquor in 1919–20~~.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The cultivation tract ~~itself and the wholesale system~~ that supplied districts such as Pabna are documented separately in O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> and in Hem Chunder Kerr's 1877 cultivation survey,<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877.{{repetitive}}{{relevance}} Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, ~~House of Commons, 1893.</ref>~~ and the ~~retail and revenue~~ structure of the Presidency trade as a whole is treated in [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]].		The gazetteer supplies a quantified consumption-side data point for a district immediately south of the licensed cultivation tract: the excise figures for 1919–20, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country spirits.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The cultivation tract that supplied districts such as Pabna, and the structure of the Presidency trade as a whole, are treated in [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]] and [[Ganja Mahal]].

	== Editions and availability ==		== Editions and availability ==

File:Gazetteer-pabna-1923.png

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 17:09:47 GMT

Eloise Zomia uploaded File:Gazetteer-pabna-1923.png First page of 'Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923)' by L. S. S. O'Malley

New page

== Summary ==
First page of 'Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923)' by L. S. S. O'Malley

== Licensing ==
{{Fair-use}}

Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923)

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 17:05:05 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:05, 31 May 2026
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~<!-- DRAFT — Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923) — landrace.wiki Historical Source page~~
	~~Modelled on the deployed/staged Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas (1910) page.~~
	~~Source fully term-swept this session (sweep_Pabna_Gazetteer_2026-05-30.md). Wikitext below~~
	~~the marker. Deployment Éloïse's. Infobox image is a placeholder — upload or blank before deploy. -->~~

	{{Infobox Historical Source		{{Infobox Historical Source
	\|title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna		\|title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna
Line 35:		Line 30:
	}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1923. It is one of the volumes of the Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes the district of [[Pabna]], which the gazetteer dates as a separate charge from 1828; the district lay in the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923. Page references in this article follow the 1923 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>		}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1923. It is one of the volumes of the Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes the district of [[Pabna]], which the gazetteer dates as a separate charge from 1828; the district lay in the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923. Page references in this article follow the 1923 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>

	The gazetteer is not a cultivation source in the manner of the lowland Bengal ganja surveys. Its only direct cannabis content is the chapter on '''General Administration''', whose excise subsection records the district's ganja revenue for 1919–20 (pp. 95–96); the agricultural statistics separately return acreage under '''sunn hemp''', the unrelated fibre legume, among the district's crops.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Unlike O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer, which gives the [[Ganja Mahal\|ganja mahal]] a chapter of its own, and unlike the Santal Parganas volume, which records the ascetic ganja use of the Sapha Har, the Pabna gazetteer treats cannabis incidentally and only on the consumption side.		The gazetteer is not a cultivation source in the manner of the lowland Bengal ganja surveys.{{definition by negation}} Its only direct cannabis content is the chapter on '''General Administration''', whose excise subsection records the district's ganja revenue for 1919–20 (pp. 95–96); the agricultural statistics separately return acreage under '''sunn hemp''', the unrelated fibre legume, among the district's crops.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>{{definition by negation}} Unlike O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer, which gives the [[Ganja Mahal\|ganja mahal]] a chapter of its own, and unlike the Santal Parganas volume, which records the ascetic ganja use of the Sapha Har, the Pabna gazetteer treats cannabis incidentally and only on the consumption side.{{definition by negation}}

	== Composition and publication ==		== Composition and publication ==
Line 47:		Line 42:
	The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the majority of the Bengal District Gazetteers: Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Natural Calamities, Agriculture, Industries Labour and Trade, Means of Communication, Land Revenue Administration and the General Administration of the district, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The History chapter dates the district's creation as a separate charge to 1828 and treats the agrarian disturbances of 1873; the People chapter draws on the census of 1921.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>		The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the majority of the Bengal District Gazetteers: Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Natural Calamities, Agriculture, Industries Labour and Trade, Means of Communication, Land Revenue Administration and the General Administration of the district, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The History chapter dates the district's creation as a separate charge to 1828 and treats the agrarian disturbances of 1873; the People chapter draws on the census of 1921.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

	The cannabis-relevant material sits in two chapters. The chapter on '''General Administration''' contains the excise subsection, where the district's intoxicant revenue is tabulated (pp. 95–96).<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The '''Agriculture''' chapter returns acreage under the district's fibre crops, where sunn hemp is listed and named.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The volume carries no dedicated cultivation account of drug cannabis and, unlike the Rajshahi and Santal Parganas gazetteers, no religious or ethnographic cannabis material.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916, ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144.</ref>		The cannabis-relevant material sits in two chapters. The chapter on '''General Administration''' contains the excise subsection, where the district's intoxicant revenue is tabulated (pp. 95–96).<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The '''Agriculture''' chapter returns acreage under the district's fibre crops, where sunn hemp is listed and named.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>{{relevance}} The volume carries no dedicated cultivation account of drug cannabis and, unlike the Rajshahi and Santal Parganas gazetteers, no religious or ethnographic cannabis material.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916, ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144.</ref>{{repetitive}}

	== Cannabis in the text ==		== Cannabis in the text ==
Line 59:		Line 54:
	=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===		=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===

	The agricultural statistics return the district's fibre acreage as jute, some 126,000 acres, and '''sunn hemp''', some 29,000 acres.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer is explicit that this is sunn hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), the fibre legume unrelated to ''Cannabis sativa'', describing it as raised in the winter season and ploughed into the ground as a green manure for the following jute crop.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Because the volume names the sunn hemp directly rather than returning an undifferentiated "hemp", the acreage carries none of the ambiguity that attaches to the "hemp" returns of some other Bengal district gazetteers, and is not evidence of drug-cannabis cultivation.		The agricultural statistics return the district's fibre acreage as jute, some 126,000 acres, and '''sunn hemp''', some 29,000 acres.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer is explicit that this is sunn hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), the fibre legume unrelated to ''Cannabis sativa'', describing it as raised in the winter season and ploughed into the ground as a green manure for the following jute crop.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Because the volume names the sunn hemp directly rather than returning an undifferentiated "hemp", the acreage carries none of the ambiguity that attaches to the "hemp" returns of some other Bengal district gazetteers, and is not evidence of drug-cannabis cultivation.{{relevance}}{{definition by negation}}

	== Significance for landrace documentation ==		== Significance for landrace documentation ==

	The gazetteer's value to the documentation of South Asian cannabis is consumption-side rather than agricultural. Its excise figures give a quantified retail picture for a district on the southern edge of the Bengal cannabis world, immediately below the licensed cultivation tract, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country liquor in 1919–20.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The cultivation tract itself and the wholesale system that supplied districts such as Pabna are documented separately in O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> and in Hem Chunder Kerr's 1877 cultivation survey,<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877. Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref> and the retail and revenue structure of the Presidency trade as a whole is treated in [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]].		The gazetteer's value to the documentation of South Asian cannabis is consumption-side rather than agricultural.{{definition by negation}}{{llm}} Its excise figures give a quantified retail picture for a district on the southern edge of the Bengal cannabis world, immediately below the licensed cultivation tract, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country liquor in 1919–20.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The cultivation tract itself and the wholesale system that supplied districts such as Pabna are documented separately in O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> and in Hem Chunder Kerr's 1877 cultivation survey,<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877.{{repetitive}}{{relevance}} Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref> and the retail and revenue structure of the Presidency trade as a whole is treated in [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]].

	== Editions and availability ==		== Editions and availability ==

Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna (1923)

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 17:00:52 GMT

Created page with " {{Infobox Historical Source |title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers:..."

New page

{{Infobox Historical Source
|title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna
|title_english =
|title_latin =
|image = Gazetteer-pabna-1923.jpg
|image_caption =
|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley|L. S. S. O'Malley]]
|author_dates = 1874–1941
|editor =
|language = English
|composed = c. 1922–1923
|period = 20th century sources
|regional_cat = India
|published = 1923
|publisher = The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot
|place = [[Calcutta]]
|volumes = 1 (a volume of the Bengal District Gazetteers series)
|cannabis_volume =
|cannabis_pages = 95–96
|cannabis_chapter = General Administration (Excise)
|cannabis_plates =
|growing_regions =
|varieties =
|preparations = Ganja
|uses_documented = Consumption; excise
|taxonomic_significance =
|digital_facsimile = https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437
|original_held_at = National Library of India, Kolkata
|translation =
}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1923. It is one of the volumes of the Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes the district of [[Pabna]], which the gazetteer dates as a separate charge from 1828; the district lay in the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923. Page references in this article follow the 1923 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>

The gazetteer is not a cultivation source in the manner of the lowland Bengal ganja surveys. Its only direct cannabis content is the chapter on '''General Administration''', whose excise subsection records the district's ganja revenue for 1919–20 (pp. 95–96); the agricultural statistics separately return acreage under '''sunn hemp''', the unrelated fibre legume, among the district's crops.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Unlike O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer, which gives the [[Ganja Mahal|ganja mahal]] a chapter of its own, and unlike the Santal Parganas volume, which records the ascetic ganja use of the Sapha Har, the Pabna gazetteer treats cannabis incidentally and only on the consumption side.

== Composition and publication ==

O'Malley (1874–1941) wrote thirty of the thirty-eight volumes in the revised Bengal District Gazetteers series he superintended, most of them published between 1906 and 1911; the Pabna volume is one of the later issues, published in 1923.<ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley"/><ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> It was prepared from the existing administrative record, the census of 1921 and the contemporaneous settlement material.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

The district the volume describes lies in the active floodplain of the Padma and the Jamuna, an area of silted river beds, shifting chars and the great Chalan Bil wetland.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer gives the district an area of 1,678 square miles and, on the census of 1921, a population of 1,389,494; the administrative headquarters was the town of Pabna on the Ichhamati, while the chief commercial town was [[Sirajganj]], described as an important jute emporium on the Jamuna.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

== Structure and content ==

The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the majority of the Bengal District Gazetteers: Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Natural Calamities, Agriculture, Industries Labour and Trade, Means of Communication, Land Revenue Administration and the General Administration of the district, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The History chapter dates the district's creation as a separate charge to 1828 and treats the agrarian disturbances of 1873; the People chapter draws on the census of 1921.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

The cannabis-relevant material sits in two chapters. The chapter on '''General Administration''' contains the excise subsection, where the district's intoxicant revenue is tabulated (pp. 95–96).<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The '''Agriculture''' chapter returns acreage under the district's fibre crops, where sunn hemp is listed and named.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The volume carries no dedicated cultivation account of drug cannabis and, unlike the Rajshahi and Santal Parganas gazetteers, no religious or ethnographic cannabis material.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916, ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144.</ref>

== Cannabis in the text ==

=== Excise and consumption ===

The excise subsection of the General Administration chapter tabulates the district's excise revenue for the year 1919–20. The aggregate was Rs. 2,22,000, representing an incidence of 2 annas 5 pies per head of the population; of this, the larger share came from hemp drugs:
{{Quote|Of this sum Rs. 83,000 were derived from country spirits and Rs. 1,12,000 from hemp drugs, mainly gánja.|''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna'' (1923), pp. 95–96}}
Hemp drugs thus out-earned country spirits in the district.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer records average consumption of half a gallon of country spirit and one-sixth of a seer of hemp drugs for every hundred persons, and gives the density of licensed shops as one hemp-drug shop to every 8 square miles in the urban areas of the district and one to every 54 square miles in the rural areas, against 20 country-spirit shops in all.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The figures describe a consumption district immediately south of the licensed cultivation tract; the gazetteer does not describe the wholesale or warehouse arrangements of the trade, which belong to the Rajshahi and Naogaon record.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===

The agricultural statistics return the district's fibre acreage as jute, some 126,000 acres, and '''sunn hemp''', some 29,000 acres.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The gazetteer is explicit that this is sunn hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), the fibre legume unrelated to ''Cannabis sativa'', describing it as raised in the winter season and ploughed into the ground as a green manure for the following jute crop.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Because the volume names the sunn hemp directly rather than returning an undifferentiated "hemp", the acreage carries none of the ambiguity that attaches to the "hemp" returns of some other Bengal district gazetteers, and is not evidence of drug-cannabis cultivation.

== Significance for landrace documentation ==

The gazetteer's value to the documentation of South Asian cannabis is consumption-side rather than agricultural. Its excise figures give a quantified retail picture for a district on the southern edge of the Bengal cannabis world, immediately below the licensed cultivation tract, in which the duty and licence fees on hemp drugs out-earned those on country liquor in 1919–20.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> The cultivation tract itself and the wholesale system that supplied districts such as Pabna are documented separately in O'Malley's Rajshahi gazetteer<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> and in Hem Chunder Kerr's 1877 cultivation survey,<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877. Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref> and the retail and revenue structure of the Presidency trade as a whole is treated in [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]].

== Editions and availability ==

The work was published in 1923 by the Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, as a volume of the Bengal District Gazetteers.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> A full-text scan of the 1923 first edition is held by the Internet Archive through the Digital Library of India under the identifier ''in.ernet.dli.2015.39437''; it is the copy whose pagination is followed in this article.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/>

== See also ==
* [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]] – the Presidency-wide licit trade whose retail end the excise figures illustrate
* [[Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi (1916)]] – the gazetteer of the Ganja Mahal cultivation tract
* [[Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal (1877)]] – the foundational survey of Bengal ganja cultivation
* [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] – the 1893–94 colonial inquiry into hemp drugs
* [[Ganja Mahal]] – the licensed ganja cultivation tract of the Bengal lowlands
* [[Cannabis in West Bengal]] – the regional cannabis overview

== References ==
<references />

=== Further reading ===
* O'Malley, L.S.S., ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi'', Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916.
* O'Malley, L.S.S., ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas'', Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1910.

== External links ==
* [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''] – 1923 first edition, Internet Archive (Digital Library of India)

Cannabis trade in West Bengal

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 16:55:37 GMT

Colonial period

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:55, 30 May 2026
Line 8:		Line 8:

	== Colonial period ==		== Colonial period ==
			{{Main\|Cannabis in Colonial India\|Bengal Presidency cannabis trade}}
	Calcutta was the financial and wholesale back-end of the colonial Bengal cannabis economy. Wholesale dealers (''mahajans'') converged on the [[Ganja Mahal]] during the January to April marketing season to buy product directly at the ''gola'', taking dispatches under transport permit by river, by road and (from the 1870s) by the [[Eastern Bengal Railway]].{{cn}} Distribution centres across the Presidency included [[Dhaka]], Pabna, Khulna, Jessore, [[Chittagong]], Comilla, Mymensingh, Barishal and Sylhet, with overland routes to the United Provinces, Bihar and the Central Provinces.<ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989," ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref> Smuggling into Lower Burma, where cultivation, sale and possession had been prohibited under the Burma Excise Act of 1873, was a continuing concern of the colonial excise administration. Smaller export movements to indentured-labour destinations (Trinidad, Guyana, Fiji, Natal) and to British and American pharmaceutical houses for medical ''Cannabis indica'' preparations are documented in the India Office Records.<ref name="Mills2003">Mills, James H., ''Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade and Prohibition 1800–1928'', Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, ch. 3 and ch. 6.</ref>		Calcutta was the financial and wholesale back-end of the colonial Bengal cannabis economy. Wholesale dealers (''mahajans'') converged on the [[Ganja Mahal]] during the January to April marketing season to buy product directly at the ''gola'', taking dispatches under transport permit by river, by road and (from the 1870s) by the [[Eastern Bengal Railway]].{{cn}} Distribution centres across the Presidency included [[Dhaka]], Pabna, Khulna, Jessore, [[Chittagong]], Comilla, Mymensingh, Barishal and Sylhet, with overland routes to the United Provinces, Bihar and the Central Provinces.<ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989," ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref> Smuggling into Lower Burma, where cultivation, sale and possession had been prohibited under the Burma Excise Act of 1873, was a continuing concern of the colonial excise administration. Smaller export movements to indentured-labour destinations (Trinidad, Guyana, Fiji, Natal) and to British and American pharmaceutical houses for medical ''Cannabis indica'' preparations are documented in the India Office Records.<ref name="Mills2003">Mills, James H., ''Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade and Prohibition 1800–1928'', Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, ch. 3 and ch. 6.</ref>

Bengal Presidency cannabis trade

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 16:48:01 GMT

Created page with " '''Bengal Presidency cannabis trade''' refers to the licensed, excise-regulated commerce in Cannabis|cann..."

New page

'''Bengal Presidency cannabis trade''' refers to the licensed, excise-regulated commerce in [[Cannabis|cannabis]] preparations - [[Ganja|ganja]], [[Bhang|bhang]] and [[Charas|charas]] - across the [[Bengal Presidency]] under [[East India Company]] and Crown rule, from the consolidation of Company authority in the late eighteenth century to [[Partition of India|Partition]] in 1947. From the 1790s the colonial state taxed cannabis through a licensing system inherited from Mughal-era *abkari* (excise) practice, and over the nineteenth century it confined licensed cultivation to a single small tract in northern Bengal, the [[Ganja Mahal]] around [[Naogaon]], while the manufactured product was distributed and consumed across the Presidency and beyond.<ref name="Mills2003">Mills, James H., [https://archive.org/details/cannabisbritanni0000mill ''Cannabis Britannica: Empire, Trade, and Prohibition 1800–1928''], Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2003.</ref><ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.66.21 "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref>

The trade was built on a graduated excise duty levied at the point of issue from licensed warehouses, on a small body of wholesale dealers who carried the drug under transport permit, and on a network of licensed retail shops. It was examined in detail by the [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] of 1893–94, which rejected prohibition and recommended that the Bengal model of confined cultivation, warehouse monopoly and high duty be extended to the other provinces of [[British Raj|British India]].<ref name="IHDC1894-I">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I.</ref> Although it generated significant revenue, the cannabis trade was always far smaller than the [[opium]] trade that dominated colonial fiscal policy in Bengal.<ref name="Mills2003"/> Because the licensed cultivation belt lay entirely within what is now [[Bangladesh]], the two provinces that took the name "Bengal" after Partition stood in different relations to the trade: [[West Bengal]] retained the principal consumption markets and the wholesale and retail infrastructure, while the production tract passed to East Pakistan.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

== Pre-monopoly trade, c.1722–1789 ==

The earliest written notice of cannabis cultivation in Bengal identified in colonial records dates from 1722, when the East India Company conducted experimental trials of hemp as a fibre crop.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> James H. Mills describes a divided late-eighteenth-century Company interest: a sustained but unsuccessful attempt by the [[William Roxburgh|Calcutta Botanic Garden]] to grow European-style fibre hemp on the Bengal plain, and a parallel willingness to tax the existing peasant trade in narcotic ganja.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

Before any formal monopoly the trade was scattered and taxation was overlaid on the Mughal-era *abkari* farms that the Company inherited. The major early production zone was around [[Jessore]] in southern Bengal, where the tracts of Keshabpur, Fakirhat and Noyapara are estimated to have produced some 2,000 to 2,400 tonnes of cannabis annually before the 1870s; the Jessore industry was suppressed in 1875 as administrative consolidation shifted licensed cultivation north to the Naogaon area of [[Rajshahi]] district.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> Cultivation in this phase occurred on lands held under tenure from *zamindari* estates created by the [[Permanent Settlement]] of 1793, and large revenue-paying landlords were central intermediaries; the detail of pre-1860s tenancy arrangements is poorly documented in surviving published sources and has been reconstructed mainly from Bengal Board of Revenue files.<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, [https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/107915 "Naogaon and the world: Intoxication, commoditisation, and imperialism in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1840–1940,"] PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.</ref>

== The excise framework ==

The legal foundation of the trade was laid in 1790, when duties on alcohol and other intoxicating drugs were first levied by the British on landlords in Bengal, and in 1793, when [[Permanent Settlement|Regulation XXXIV of 1793]] - part of the Cornwallis Code - specified that no person was to manufacture or sell bhang, ganja, charas or other intoxicating drugs without a licence from the collector of the district. The Commission's own historical chapter records that the system was introduced "with a view to check immoderate consumption, and at the same time to augment the public revenue."<ref name="IHDC1894-III">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://digital.nls.uk/indiapapers/browse/archive/74908458 ''Report''], 1894, vol. III, "Appendices, Miscellaneous." (Wellcome/NLS scan, archive identifier b32222920_0003.)</ref> In 1800 the manufacture and sale of charas was prohibited as being of a noxious quality; the restriction was rescinded in 1824 on the ground that charas was not more harmful than ganja or the other intoxicating drugs.<ref name="IHDC1894-III"/>

Across the first half of the nineteenth century the licensing of manufacture and sale was tightened through a succession of excise regulations, the trade being progressively narrowed to a single licensed source. The arrangements were codified for cultivation under Bengal Act VII of 1878 and for vend through the contemporaneous excise rules, which together fixed the duty structure, the warehousing requirement and the licensing of wholesale and retail dealers that defined the trade for the rest of the colonial period.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

== Production and the Ganja Mahal ==

{{Main|Ganja Mahal}}

By the 1850s licensed cultivation had been consolidated into a small tract in northern Bengal, administratively designated the Ganja Mahal, lying across the boundaries of the old [[Rajshahi]], [[Bogra]] and [[Dinajpur]] districts with its headquarters at [[Naogaon]].<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916. Page references follow the 1916 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.206886''; also catalogued as ''dli.ministry.07426'').</ref> Within the tract cultivation was permitted only on land specified in a written licence, and was organised on a three-circle rotation that limited supply and simplified inspection.<ref name="Rahman2023">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.67.99 "Traditional Cultivation and the Production System of Cannabis by the Ganja Society in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 67(4), 2023, pp. 99–109.</ref> The tract was the sole licensed origin of the manufactured ganja that supplied the Presidency trade; its cultivation system, manufacture and revenue administration are treated in the dedicated article.

Bengal ganja was traded in three grades, distinguished for duty purposes: flat ganja, the bulk product, pressed into cakes on the manufacturing platform; round ganja, rolled into cylindrical form, the long-stalked variety commanding the highest price; and *chur* ganja, the resinous fragments collected from the platform floor and sold at lower duty.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The Commission regarded the flat and round ganja of Bengal as distinct from the charas of Punjab and Yarkand and from the inferior unmanufactured ganja of the [[Bombay Presidency|Bombay]] and [[Madras Presidency|Madras]] presidencies.<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch3">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I, ch. III, "Production and Area of Cultivation."</ref>

== Wholesale distribution and the gola system ==

Manufactured ganja could not enter the trade directly. It was deposited under guard in licensed warehouses, the *gola*, kept by a warehouse-keeper and supervised by the Ganja Supervisor and the Excise Department. A wholesale dealer (*mahajan*) required two further licences: one to purchase the drug at the gola, and one to transport it outside the Mahal. Duty was levied at the point of issue from the warehouse, before the drug passed to the retail vendors.<ref name="Mills2003"/> The structure gave the administration a single chokepoint at which to count stock, assess duty and detect leakage, and it is the feature the Commission most often held up as a model.<ref name="IHDC1894-III"/>

Wholesale dealers converged on the Mahal during the marketing season, which ran from about January to April after the harvest, to buy product at the gola and dispatch it under transport permit.<ref name="Mills2003"/> The first assistant supervisor of cultivation at Naogaon described the warehousing and dispatch arrangements to the Commission in 1894.<ref name="IHDC1894-IV-Soor">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/dli.csl.1843 ''Report''], 1894, vol. IV, ''Evidence of Witnesses from Bengal and Assam'', Witness 84, Sib Chandra Soor, First Assistant Supervisor of Ganja Cultivation, Naogaon, pp. 230–258.</ref>

== Markets and distribution within Bengal ==

From the Mahal the drug moved by river, road and, from the 1870s, by the [[Eastern Bengal Railway]] and its branch to Santahar. River carriage along the [[Jamuna River|Jamuna]] and its tributaries was the principal artery. The Commission and later studies identify the principal sales points within Bengal as Dhaka, Tangail, Madaripur, Faridpur, [[Pabna]], Santahar, Khulna, Jessore, Darsona, Chittagong, Comilla, Barishal, Mymensingh, Parbatipur, Sylhet, Sunamganj and Srimangal.<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

Pabna, immediately south of the Mahal, illustrates the retail end of the trade in a consumption district. Its 1923 gazetteer records district excise revenue of Rs. 2,22,000 in 1919–20, of which Rs. 1,12,000 was derived from hemp drugs, mainly ganja, against Rs. 83,000 from country spirits - hemp drugs thus out-earning country liquor in the district.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.39437 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Pabna''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1923, pp. 95–96.</ref> Average annual consumption was about one-sixth of a *seer* of hemp drugs per hundred persons, and licensed hemp-drug shops stood at one to every 8 square miles in the urban areas of the district and one to every 54 square miles in the rural areas.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> [[Calcutta]], the Presidency capital, was the largest single consumption market.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

== Inter-provincial and export trade ==

Beyond Bengal, Naogaon ganja moved overland into the [[United Provinces]], [[Bihar]] and the [[Central Provinces (British India)|Central Provinces]], where it competed with the ganja of Bombay (Ahmednagar) and Madras (Arcot and Guindy).<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch4">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I, ch. IV, "Cultivation in each Province."</ref> [[Burma]] was a contested market: under the Burma Excise Act of 1873 the cultivation, sale and possession of ganja were prohibited in Lower Burma, and smuggling from the Bengal Mahal across the Bay of Bengal and overland by way of Chittagong remained a continuing administrative concern.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

Smaller export movements of Bengal ganja reached the indentured-labour destinations of Trinidad, Guyana, Fiji and Natal, and British and American pharmaceutical houses such as Squire and Sons and Burroughs Wellcome drew on Bengal supply for medical *Cannabis indica* preparations.<ref name="Mills2003"/> The Bengal trade was conducted throughout in plant matter rather than in extracted resin, which distinguished it from the charas trade of the northwest.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

== Revenue ==

The trade was a settled source of excise income. Across the 1860s the Government of Bengal collected on average about Rs. 1,000,000 a year in duty on ganja shops and gola issues.<ref name="IHDC1894-III"/> The Pabna figures for 1919–20, in which hemp drugs out-earned country spirits, indicate the weight the retail trade could carry in a single consumption district.<ref name="OMalley1923-Pabna"/> Set against the wider colonial revenue system, however, the cannabis trade was minor: it was consistently dwarfed by the opium trade, which by the 1840s was the second largest source of revenue for the Government of India, and the administration's interest in cannabis was always subordinate to its interest in opium.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

== The Indian Hemp Drugs Commission and the trade ==

{{Main|Indian Hemp Drugs Commission}}

The trade was the central subject of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, appointed in 1893 after a parliamentary question on the effects of ganja and the desirability of prohibiting its growth and sale.<ref name="IHDC1894-I"/> Bengal supplied the largest single body of evidence to the inquiry, including the testimony of supervisory officers from the Naogaon tract.<ref name="IHDC1894-IV-Soor"/> The Commission found no trustworthy basis for a connection between the moderate use of hemp drugs and insanity, rejected prohibition, and recommended that the Bengal regulatory model - licensed cultivation confined to a small area, a monopoly gola system and a graduated duty pitched as high as the suppression of smuggling would allow - be extended to the other provinces.<ref name="IHDC1894-I"/>

== Decline and Partition ==

The interwar decades brought a slow administrative tightening and a sustained fall in output, from a peak of about 880 tonnes in 1858 to roughly 170 tonnes by 1947.<ref name="Rahman2023"/> India was a party to the International Opium Convention concluded at Geneva in 1925, which for the first time placed cannabis, described in the convention as "Indian hemp," under international control alongside opium and cocaine.<ref name="Mills2003"/>

[[Partition of India|Partition]] in 1947 divided the trade along the Radcliffe Line. The entire licensed cultivation tract and its gola warehouses passed to East Pakistan, while [[West Bengal]] retained the principal consumption markets and the wholesale and retail vending infrastructure, including [[Calcutta]] and the [[Hooghly River|Hooghly]] riverside.<ref name="Mills2003"/> Licensed cultivation continued in East Pakistan, and later [[Bangladesh]], through the [[Ganja Society]] until it was wound down in 1987 in compliance with the [[Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs]].<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

== See also ==

* [[Ganja Mahal]]
* [[Ganja Society]]
* [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]]
* [[Cannabis in West Bengal]]
* [[Cannabis in Cooch Behar State]]
* [[Cannabis trade in West Bengal]]
* [[Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal (1877)]]
* [[Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi (1916)]]

== References ==

<references />

[[Category:Cannabis and Colonialism]]

Ganja Society

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 14:42:50 GMT

Created page with "'''Ganja Society''', formally the '''Naogaon Ganja Cultivators' Co-operative Society Ltd''' (Bengali: নওগাঁ গাঁজা চাষি সমবায় সমিতি লিমিটেড), was the growers' cooperative that held the licensed ganja monopoly of the Ganja Mahal, the Bengal Presidency's sole permitted cannabis-cultivation tract, from its registration in 1917 until the prohibition of cultivation in 1987. Formed w..."

New page

'''Ganja Society''', formally the '''Naogaon Ganja Cultivators' Co-operative Society Ltd''' (Bengali: নওগাঁ গাঁজা চাষি সমবায় সমিতি লিমিটেড), was the growers' cooperative that held the licensed [[Ganja|ganja]] monopoly of the [[Ganja Mahal]], the [[Bengal Presidency]]'s sole permitted [[Cannabis|cannabis]]-cultivation tract, from its registration in 1917 until the prohibition of cultivation in 1987. Formed when the [[Naogaon]] cultivators collectively withdrew their cultivation licences in 1916, the society took over the purchasing, grading, warehousing and sale of ''ganja'' that had until then been managed through licensed brokers under direct Excise Department supervision, the member-cultivators thereby holding the monopoly collectively.<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, [https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/107915 "Naogaon and the world: Intoxication, commoditisation, and imperialism in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1840–1940,"] PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.</ref><ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.66.21 "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref>

The society was based at Naogaon, in what is now north-western Bangladesh. Its relationship to present-day [[West Bengal]] follows that of the Ganja Mahal itself: the cultivation tract and the cooperative both lay in the territory that became East Pakistan in 1947, while the downstream consumption markets and the wholesale and retail trade remained with West Bengal and [[Calcutta]].<ref name="Rahman2022"/> The cooperative outlasted the end of cultivation and continued in a reduced, custodial form into the twenty-first century.<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

== Formation ==

Before 1917 the cultivators of the Ganja Mahal worked within a monopoly administered directly by the Excise Department, selling their manufactured ''ganja'' at the Naogaon warehouses to licensed wholesale dealers, commonly through brokers, and depending on larger landholders and moneylenders for credit and for access to those buyers.<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018"/> In 1916 the Naogaon growers collectively withdrew their cultivation licences, and in the following year they registered the Naogaon Ganja Cultivators' Co-operative Society under the [[Co-operative Societies Act, 1912]].<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018"/><ref name="Rahman2022"/> The registration completed the transfer of the monopoly into the cultivators' own hands: thereafter the society, rather than individual brokers, held the right to purchase, grade, store and sell the tract's entire output, under the continuing supervision of the excise authorities.<ref name="Rahman2023">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.67.99 "Traditional Cultivation and the Production System of Cannabis by the Ganja Society in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 67(4), 2023, pp. 99–109.</ref>

== Organisation and governance ==

The society was run by a managing committee to which each of the Mahal's three cultivation circles, Muradpur, Kirtipur and Gobindapur, elected its own representatives, carrying the tract's existing three-circle structure into the cooperative's administration.<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018"/><ref name="Rahman2023"/> Grading of the ''ganja'' was handled by a separate committee of six members elected by the cultivators together with one manager appointed by the society, which classified the product into first, second and third grades.<ref name="Rahman2023"/> The cooperative was monitored both by the government's co-operative administration and by the department responsible for narcotics and excise, reflecting its dual character as a registered cooperative and as the licensed holder of a narcotics monopoly.<ref name="Rahman2023"/>

The society replaced the earlier temporary arrangements with a permanent office at Naogaon. Its foundation stone was laid in 1919 by the Excise Commissioner, and the completed building was opened on 16 February 1921 by Syed Nawab Ali Chowdhury, then a minister in the Government of Bengal.<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

== Operations ==

The society's commercial role lay within the same monopoly system that had operated before 1917, now run for the cultivators' collective account. It bought the manufactured ''ganja'' from the licensed growers, graded it, held it under bond in the Naogaon warehouses (''gola'') and sold it to wholesale dealers licensed in the consumption districts, the duty being levied as the drug left the warehouse.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2022"/> The cultivation and manufacturing practices behind that output, and the downstream movement of the drug to market, are treated in [[Ganja Mahal]] and [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]] respectively. The profits of the trade, after the government's duty, were distributed among the member-cultivators.<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

== Socio-economic role ==

The wealth generated by the monopoly allowed the society to act well beyond a purely commercial body. Its funds supported schools and a dispensary in the cultivating area and provided stipends for students.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> During a famine in Bengal in the 1940s the society drew about Rs 2 lakh from its funds to buy rice for the cultivating community, which is reported to have suffered fewer deaths than neighbouring areas as a result.<ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.69.1 "Studies on Ethnobotany of Folk Customs for Cannabis in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 69(1), 2025, pp. 1–8.</ref> Much of the processing and packing labour on which the trade depended was done by women of the landless [[Santal people|Santal]] community, who held no cultivation land in the tract.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms"/>

== Decline and present status ==

The [[Partition of India|partition]] of 1947 placed the whole cultivation tract, and with it the society, in East Pakistan, while the consumption markets and the wholesale and retail trade remained in West Bengal; the loss of those markets sharply contracted the society's business.<ref name="Rahman2022"/> The society's registered name was changed in 1965, and much of its pre-1951 documentation, including the records of the colonial and early Pakistan periods, was lost during the 1971 war of independence.<ref name="Rahman2022"/><ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018"/> Cultivation continued, much reduced, until it was prohibited in 1987 in compliance with the obligations of the [[Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs]], and licensed sales ended in 1989.<ref name="Rahman2022"/>

After the end of cultivation the society continued to exist as a custodial body, its office run by a small staff and its warehouses and other properties no longer used for their original purpose.<ref name="Rahman2022"/><ref name="Rahman2025-FolkCustoms"/> Its surviving stock books and resolution books have become a principal source for the modern study of the Mahal, in the field-based work of A.M. Rahman and colleagues and the historical research of Utathya Chattopadhyaya.<ref name="Rahman2023"/><ref name="Chattopadhyaya2025">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, ''Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India'', University of California Press, Oakland, 2025. ISBN 978-0-520-42568-2.</ref>

== See also ==
* [[Bengal Presidency cannabis trade]]
* [[Cannabis in West Bengal]]
* [[Ganja Mahal]]
* [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]]
* [[Naogaon]]

== References ==
<references />

[[Category:Cannabis and Colonialism]]
[[Category:Bangladesh]]

Ganja Mahal

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 13:35:53 GMT

Show changes

Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi (1916)

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:36:34 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:36, 30 May 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\|title_english =		\|title_english =
	\|title_latin =		\|title_latin =
	\|image = Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.~~jpg~~		\|image = Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.png
	\|image_caption =		\|image_caption =
	\|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]		\|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley\|L. S. S. O'Malley]]

File:Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.png

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:36:19 GMT

Eloise Zomia uploaded File:Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.png

New page

== Licensing ==
{{Fair-use}}

Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi (1916)

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:34:30 GMT

Created page with "{{Infobox Historical Source |title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi |title_english = |title_latin = |image = Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.jpg |image_caption = |author = L. S. S. O'Malley |author_dates = 1874–1941 |editor = |language = English |composed = c. 1915–1916 |period = 20th century sources |regional_cat = India |published..."

New page

{{Infobox Historical Source
|title_original = Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi
|title_english =
|title_latin =
|image = Gazetteer-rajshahi-1916.jpg
|image_caption =
|author = [[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley|L. S. S. O'Malley]]
|author_dates = 1874–1941
|editor =
|language = English
|composed = c. 1915–1916
|period = 20th century sources
|regional_cat = India
|published = 1916
|publisher = The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot
|place = [[Calcutta]]
|volumes = 1 (a volume of the Bengal District Gazetteers series)
|cannabis_volume =
|cannabis_pages = 45, 132–133, 134–144, 191
|cannabis_chapter = ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal"
|cannabis_plates =
|growing_regions = Naogaon ganja tract (the ganja mahal)
|varieties =
|preparations = Ganja (flat and round chur); charas; bhang
|uses_documented = Cultivation; excise and trade; religious and ascetic
|taxonomic_significance =
|digital_facsimile = https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886
|original_held_at =
|translation =
}}The '''''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''''' is a district [[gazetteer]] compiled by the Indian Civil Service officer '''[[Lewis Sydney Steward O'Malley|L. S. S. O'Malley]]''' and published at [[Calcutta]] in 1916. It is one of the revised Bengal District Gazetteers, the standardised provincial reference series issued under the authority of the Government of Bengal. The volume describes Rajshahi, a district of the Rajshahi Division of [[Bengal Presidency]] on the right bank of the Padma; the district lay in eastern Bengal at the time of writing and today forms part of [[Bangladesh]].<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1916. Page references in this article follow the 1916 first edition (Internet Archive ''in.ernet.dli.2015.206886''; also catalogued as ''dli.ministry.07426'').</ref><ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley">Fuller, C.J., [https://www.berose.fr/article2913.html "An Anthropologist and Historian Ahead of His Time: L. S. S. O'Malley in British India"], ''BEROSE International Encyclopaedia of the Histories of Anthropology'', Paris, 2023.</ref>

Unlike most of the series, the volume is a cultivation source of the first rank. Rajshahi contained the [[Ganja Mahal|ganja mahal]], the Government-supervised tract in the [[Naogaon]] subdivision that was the licensed source of [[ganja]] for the greater part of British India, and O'Malley gives it a chapter of its own (ch. XII, "The Ganja Mahal," pp. 134–144).<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> That chapter is the volume's principal cannabis content; shorter references occur in the excise subsection of the General Administration chapter (pp. 132–133), in the account of the district's people (a ganja-using religious sect, p. 64), and in the place-by-place gazetteer (the Raja of Tahirpur as a member of the [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]], p. 191).<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> O'Malley states that the chapter was compiled chiefly from Hem Chunder Kerr's 1877 cultivation survey and from the report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission of 1894, and it is best read as a 1916 administrative digest of those two sources rather than as an independent inquiry.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

== Composition and publication ==

O'Malley (1874–1941) wrote thirty of the thirty-eight volumes in the revised Bengal District Gazetteers series he superintended, most of them published between 1906 and 1911; the Rajshahi volume is one of the later ones, issued in 1916.<ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley"/> Like the rest of the series it was prepared from the existing administrative record, and the cannabis chapter draws on the two standard authorities on the subject. A footnote at the head of the chapter records that it "has been compiled chiefly from a Report on the Cultivation of Ganja by Hem Chandra Kar (1877) and the Report of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission (1894)".<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The first of these is [[Hem Chunder Kerr]]'s ''[[Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal (1877)|Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal]]'', the foundational 1877 survey of the Bengal tract;<ref name="Kerr1877">Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877. Reprinted as a Parliamentary Paper, House of Commons, 1893.</ref> the second is the seven-volume report of the [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] of 1893–94.<ref name="IHDC1894-I">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I.</ref> The gazetteer's account of the cultivation cycle and of the excise machinery follows these sources closely, with figures brought up to the second decade of the twentieth century.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

== Structure and content ==

The volume follows the standardised chapter scheme shared by the Bengal District Gazetteers, with chapters covering Physical Aspects, History, The People, Public Health, Agriculture, Natural Calamities, Rents, Wages and Prices, Material Condition, Forests, Mines and Minerals, Land Revenue, General Administration, Local Self-Government and Education, followed by a place-by-place gazetteer and an index.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Its handling of cannabis differs from the rest of the series in degree: where O'Malley's contemporaneous ''[[Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas (1910)|Santal Parganas]]'' volume treats the drug incidentally and carries no cultivation account, the Rajshahi volume devotes a full chapter to the licensed tract.<ref name="OMalley1910-SantalParganas">O'Malley, L.S.S., [https://archive.org/details/dli.ministry.07432 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas''], The Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, 1910.</ref>

The cannabis-relevant material occupies four parts of the book. The History chapter notes the administrative consolidation of the tract (ch. II, p. 45); the chapter on '''The People''' records a ganja-using sect among the district's heterodox Muslims (p. 64); the '''General Administration''' chapter tabulates the district's intoxicant excise (pp. 132–133); and the chapter on '''The Ganja Mahal''' gives the cultivation, manufacture, administration and economy of the tract in full (ch. XII, pp. 134–144).<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> A further notice of an Indian Hemp Drugs commissioner appears in the gazetteer of places (p. 191).<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

== Cannabis in the text ==

=== The ganja mahal ===

The chapter defines the ganja mahal as the area in the Naogaon subdivision in which the hemp plant (''[[Cannabis sativa]]'') was grown under Government supervision for its three products, ganja, charas and bhang.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> It places the tract at 76 square miles across the Naogaon, Badalgachhi and Mahadebpur thanas, comprising 322 villages, with about 7,094 acres suitable for the crop; the area actually cultivated averaged some 970 acres over the preceding seven years, for a normal outturn of 8,000 maunds, against a statutory maximum then fixed by the Government of India at 1,026 acres.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The consolidation of the tract under a single authority is dated to 1896–97 in the History chapter, which records the transfer to Rajshahi of the Mahadebpur thana from Dinajpur and of portions of two Bogra thanas, the object being "to bring the whole area growing gánja under one jurisdiction"; the Naogaon subdivision itself had been created in 1877.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

The chapter sets out the markets the tract supplied, a description that places Rajshahi ganja across eastern and northern India and beyond:
{{Quote|The Mahal supplies not merely the needs of the whole of Bengal and Assam, but also those of Bihar and Orissa and of a part of the United Provinces; some is also exported to the Feudatory States of Orissa and Cooch Behar, and a small quantity is shipped to London, whence it is passed on to the West Indies.|''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi'' (1916), p. 134}}
The reference to export to the Feudatory State of [[Cooch Behar State|Cooch Behar]] connects the tract directly to the princely excise system documented separately for that state.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== Cultivation and manufacture ===

The chapter describes the cultivation cycle in full: seedlings raised in a sandy nursery, transplanted into the field in September, then repeatedly manured and trimmed to force a pyramidal habit, with the male plants removed before pollination.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The last operation was carried out by a specialist, the ''poddar'' (or ''parakhdar''), who broke over the plants he judged to be male for the cultivator to pull up; the gazetteer notes, following Kerr, that the inspection was made in the morning for the light and that the distinctions the experts drew "cannot be described with confidence".<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Manufacture took place in fenced yards called ''chatars'', of which the chapter records twenty, distributed among three circles; it distinguishes two grades, flat ganja (''chur'') made by treading and pressing the flowering tops and round ganja made by rolling them, and explains the drying and kneading as reducing the weight of the excisable article and consolidating its resin for transit.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== Administration, licensing and revenue ===

The chapter sets out the supervisory apparatus of the monopoly. The Collector of Rajshahi was ex-officio Superintendent of the ganja mahal; the Sub-divisional Officer of Naogaon was its Deputy Superintendent, with charge of cultivation, manufacture, storage and issue; and a Supervisor in direct charge was assisted by three Excise Sub-Inspectors and an Inspector of Excise, the tract being divided into three circles named Muradpur, Kirttipur and Gobindpur.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Cultivation was confined to licensed growers, the licences granted free of charge for a single working season and specifying each man's plots; the chapter records nearly 3,000 such cultivators across some 200 villages, each working about one bigha on average.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Manufactured ganja was weighed, sealed and stored in the warehouses at Naogaon, where it was sold to licensed wholesale dealers, generally through licensed brokers entitled to a brokerage of Rs 2 per maund; the dealer's purchase was sent under a pass to his ''gola'' at the headquarters of the importing district, where it was kept under double lock.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The chapter gives the drug as taxed at Rs 20 per seer, the cultivators' price as Rs 40 to Rs 300 per maund and the retail price as 10 to 12 annas a tola, so high a margin that O'Malley observes it made the drug "worth ⅜ths of its weight in silver"; the average yearly outturn is recorded as yielding a duty of "nearly 66 lakhs or a little under £450,000".<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> This last figure is the total duty realised on the tract's output across all the provinces it supplied, and is distinct from the revenue raised on consumption within Rajshahi district itself.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== The cultivators ===

The chapter closes with an account of the cultivators quoted from a 1904 report by G. Rainy of the Indian Civil Service, which describes them in terms unusual for a colonial revenue document:
{{Quote|As a class the cultivators of the Ganja Mahal are remarkable in two ways. They are singularly peaceable and law-abiding, and they are remarkably wealthy and prosperous … They are without doubt the richest and most prosperous body of peasantry in Bengal, and their wealth and prosperity is the direct gift of Government, which has made them its partners in an enormously valuable monopoly.|G. Rainy (1904), quoted in ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi'' (1916), pp. 143–144}}
The passage illustrates a feature of the tract that modern scholarship has emphasised, the dependence of a prosperous small-peasant cultivating class on a state monopoly.<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, [https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/107915 "Naogaon and the world: Intoxication, commoditisation, and imperialism in South Asia and the Indian Ocean, 1840–1940,"] PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2018.</ref> The chapter records, by way of illustration, that the cultivators subscribed Rs 5,000 towards a higher English school at Naogaon and financed local roads and bridges themselves.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== Excise in the district ===

The excise subsection of the General Administration chapter gives the consumption-side picture for Rajshahi district itself, as distinct from the production tract. For 1914–15 the total district excise revenue is recorded as Rs 3,09,000, of which country spirit furnished 46 per cent, ganja 34 per cent and opium 9 per cent; the ganja revenue from licence fees and duty came to Rs 1,05,000, raised through 7 wholesale and 45 retail licences.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The subsection notes that only flat chur ganja was consumed in the district, and gives contemporary wholesale and retail prices.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> It records ''pachwai'', or rice beer, as commonly drunk by the Oraon and Santal populations, and tabulates the licences for ''tari'' and home-brewing alongside those for the hemp drugs.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== A ganja-smoking sect ===

The chapter on the people of the district records, among notes on its heterodox Muslim groups, a small sect described as followers of Nera Fakir or Guru Safa, said to dance, sing and smoke ganja under the direction of a ''guru'', and found at Bagmara, Tanor, Nator, Naogaon and Rampur Boalia.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The association of ganja with ecstatic and ascetic religious practice is the general pattern recorded across the colonial literature on Bengal;<ref name="IHDC1894-I-ch9">Indian Hemp Drugs Commission, [https://archive.org/details/b32222920_0001 ''Report''], 1894, vol. I, ch. IX, "Social and Religious Customs," §§430–446.</ref> the gazetteer attests its appearance in a specifically named Rajshahi sect.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== A member of the Hemp Drugs Commission ===

The gazetteer of places, in its notice of the Tahirpur family, records that Raja Sashi Shekhareshwar Ray Bahadur of Tahirpur, made a Raja in 1889 and a member of the Bengal Legislative Council, "was a member of the Indian Hemp Drugs Commission of 1893-94" and received the personal title of Raja Bahadur in 1896.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> He sat as one of the commission's Indian non-official members; the notice situates a named commissioner in the district whose ganja tract the commission examined.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

=== A fibre crop returned as "hemp" ===

The agricultural calendar and crop statistics use the word "hemp" of ''sunn'' hemp (''[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crotalaria_juncea Crotalaria juncea]''), the unrelated fibre legume frequently returned as "hemp" or "san" in colonial Bengal crop statistics, and not of the drug plant.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> The drug crop is treated only in the Ganja Mahal chapter and under the excise heading; the agricultural "hemp" acreage is not evidence of drug-cannabis cultivation outside the licensed tract.

== Reception and afterlife ==

The Bengal District Gazetteers were intended as, and became, the standard administrative description of each district, and O'Malley's volumes are used as descriptions of early-twentieth-century rural Bengal.<ref name="Fuller2023-OMalley"/> The Rajshahi chapter on the ganja mahal has remained the fullest single gazetteer account of the tract, and modern historical and agronomic studies of Naogaon ganja draw on it alongside Kerr and the Hemp Drugs Commission: Utathya Chattopadhyaya's work on the political economy of the tract,<ref name="Chattopadhyaya2018"/><ref name="Chattopadhyaya2025">Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, ''Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India'', University of California Press, Oakland, 2025. ISBN 978-0-520-42568-2.</ref> and the historical and ethnobotanical studies of the surviving Naogaon ganja-growing community by Rahman and colleagues, all treat the tract the gazetteer describes.<ref name="Rahman2022">Rahman, A.M., Nemoto, K., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B. & Sarwar, A.K.M.G., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.66.21 "A History of Cannabis (Ganja) as an Economic Crop in Bangladesh from the Late 18th Century to 1989,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 66(1), 2022, pp. 21–32.</ref><ref name="Rahman2023">Rahman, A.M.D., Matsushima, K., Uddin, S.B., Sarwar, A.K.M.G. & Nemoto, K., [https://doi.org/10.11248/jsta.67.99 "Traditional Cultivation and the Production System of Cannabis by the Ganja Society in Naogaon, Bangladesh,"] ''Tropical Agriculture and Development'' 67(4), 2023, pp. 99–109.</ref>

== Editions and availability ==

The work was first published in 1916 by the Bengal Secretariat Book Depot, Calcutta, as one of the revised Bengal District Gazetteers.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> A scan of the 1916 first edition is held by the Internet Archive through the Digital Library of India under the identifier ''in.ernet.dli.2015.206886'' (also catalogued as ''dli.ministry.07426''), the copy whose pagination is followed in this article.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/>

== Significance for landrace documentation ==

The gazetteer's value to the documentation of South Asian cannabis is that, almost alone among the district gazetteers, it is a cultivation source. Its chapter on the ganja mahal is the most accessible gazetteer-form account of the only legal ganja-producing tract in British Bengal, the tract that supplied the whole of Bengal and Assam and parts of Bihar, Orissa and the United Provinces, and from which ganja reached the Feudatory State of [[Cooch Behar State|Cooch Behar]] and, in small quantity, London and the West Indies.<ref name="OMalley1916-Rajshahi"/> Because the chapter is an administrative digest of [[Hem Chunder Kerr]]'s 1877 survey<ref name="Kerr1877"/> and the [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] report,<ref name="IHDC1894-I"/> it is a convenient secondary witness to both where those sources are otherwise hard of access, and it carries figures for the tract brought up to 1914–15. The tract lies wholly in present-day [[Bangladesh]]; the gazetteer documents the lowland cultivation system whose product moved into the territory of present-day [[West Bengal]] and the princely states on its northern margin, and complements the ethnographic and consumption-side gazetteers such as the ''[[Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas (1910)|Santal Parganas]]'' volume in the cluster of colonial Bengal cannabis records.<ref name="OMalley1910-SantalParganas"/>

== See also ==
* [[Ganja Mahal]] – the licensed ganja cultivation tract the gazetteer describes
* [[Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal (1877)]] – Hem Chunder Kerr's survey, the chapter's principal source
* [[Indian Hemp Drugs Commission]] – the 1893–94 colonial inquiry, the chapter's other principal source
* [[Bengal District Gazetteers: Santal Parganas (1910)]] – O'Malley's contemporaneous volume for the aboriginal-majority district to the west
* [[Cannabis in West Bengal]] – the regional cannabis overview
* [[Gazetteer]] – the colonial Bengal gazetteers indexed for the project

== References ==
<references />

=== Further reading ===
* Chattopadhyaya, Utathya, ''Ganja Matters: Empire and the Pursuits of Cannabis in British India'', University of California Press, Oakland, 2025.
* Kerr, Hem Chunder, ''Report on the Cultivation of, and Trade in, Ganjá in Bengal'', Bengal Secretariat Press, Calcutta, 1877.

== External links ==
* [https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.206886 ''Bengal District Gazetteers: Rajshahi''] – 1916 first edition, Internet Archive (Digital Library of India)

Santal people

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:32:16 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 30 May 2026
Line 3:		Line 3:
	\| name = Santal		\| name = Santal
	\| native_name = ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲ (''Santaṛ'') · ᱦᱚᱲ (''Hor'')		\| native_name = ᱥᱟᱱᱛᱟᱲ (''Santaṛ'') · ᱦᱚᱲ (''Hor'')
	\| image =		\| image = The_People_Of_India_1868_Sonthals.jpg
	\| image_alt =		\| image_alt = Santhals in British India, 1868
	\| caption =		\| caption = Santhals in British India, 1868
	\| population = approximately 6.7–7.6 million		\| population = approximately 6.7–7.6 million
	\| population_year = 2011–2022		\| population_year = 2011–2022

File:The People Of India 1868 Sonthals.jpg

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:31:56 GMT

Eloise Zomia uploaded File:The People Of India 1868 Sonthals.jpg Santhals in British India, 1868 This image is from the book, The People of India, a series of photographic illustrations, with descriptive letterpress, of the races and tribes of Hindustan, originally prepared under the authority of the government of India, and reproduced. by J. Forbes Watson and John William Kaye between 1868 - 1875. By J. Forbes Watson and John William Kaye - http://www.oldindianphotos.in/2009_03_02_archive.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?cu...

New page

== Summary ==
Santhals in British India, 1868

This image is from the book, The People of India, a series of photographic illustrations, with descriptive letterpress, of the races and tribes of Hindustan, originally prepared under the authority of the government of India, and reproduced. by J. Forbes Watson and John William Kaye between 1868 - 1875.

By J. Forbes Watson and John William Kaye - http://www.oldindianphotos.in/2009_03_02_archive.html, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=36309672
== Licensing ==
{{Fair-use}}

Santal people

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 10:29:47 GMT

Show changes

Template:Infobox Ethnic Group/styles.css

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 08:25:39 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:25, 30 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	.ig-infobox{width:22em;font-size:88%;line-height:1.4}		.ig-infobox{
	.ig-title{font-size:125%;text-align:center;padding:.35em;background:#e9e9ee}		float:right;
			clear:right;
			width:22em;
			margin:0 0 1em 1em;
			border:1px solid #a2a9b1;
			background:#f8f9fa;
			color:#202122;
			font-size:88%;
			line-height:1.4;
			border-spacing:3px;
			}
			.ig-title{font-size:125%;text-align:center;padding:.35em;background:#e9e9ee;font-weight:bold}
	.ig-native{text-align:center;padding:.2em;font-size:108%}		.ig-native{text-align:center;padding:.2em;font-size:108%}
	.ig-image{text-align:center;padding:.4em}		.ig-image{text-align:center;padding:.4em}
	.ig-caption{font-size:90%;line-height:1.3;padding-top:.3em}		.ig-caption{font-size:90%;line-height:1.3;padding-top:.3em}
	.ig-header{text-align:center;padding:.25em;background:#f3f3f6}		.ig-header{text-align:center;padding:.25em;background:#f3f3f6;font-weight:bold}
	.ig-data{padding:.3em .55em;vertical-align:top}		.ig-data{padding:.3em .55em;vertical-align:top}
	.ig-regions ul{margin:.15em 0 .15em 1.1em;padding:0}		.ig-regions ul{margin:.15em 0 .15em 1.1em;padding:0;list-style:none}
	.ig-regions ul ul{margin-left:1.1em}		.ig-regions ul ul{margin-left:1.1em}

Santal people

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 08:19:29 GMT

Show changes

Template:Infobox Ethnic Group/doc

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 07:48:14 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 30 May 2026
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~Hub articles on ethnic and tribal communities, written as people~~-~~level overviews (demography, language, history, religion, culture). The class exists for communities whose cannabis traditions are documented on~~ the ~~wiki but which are not represented by a single state or country article. Sits under [[:Category:Culture]]~~.		{{Documentation subpage}}
			<!-- Add categories at the bottom of this page. -->

	[[Category:~~Culture~~]]		The '''{{tl\|Infobox Ethnic Group}}''' template produces the summary sidebar for an ethnic-group ("people") hub article: a people-level overview of a community's demography, language, history, religion and culture. It always places the article in [[:Category:Ethnic Groups]].

			== Usage ==
			Copy the blank syntax to the top of the article, above the lead paragraph.

			<pre>
			{{Infobox Ethnic Group
			\| name =
			\| native_name =
			\| image =
			\| image_alt =
			\| caption =
			\| population =
			\| population_year =
			\| population_ref =
			\| regions =
			\| languages =
			\| religion =
			\| related_groups =
			\| regional_cat =
			}}
			</pre>

			=== Parameters ===
			{\| class="wikitable"
			! Parameter !! Description
			\|-
			\| <code>name</code> \|\| Title-bar name. Defaults to the page name if omitted.
			\|-
			\| <code>native_name</code> \|\| Endonym(s) in native script with transliteration, e.g. <code>ᱦᱚᱲ (''Hor'')</code>.
			\|-
			\| <code>image</code> \|\| File name only (no <code>File:</code> prefix). Optional.
			\|-
			\| <code>image_alt</code> \|\| Alt text. Required whenever <code>image</code> is set.
			\|-
			\| <code>caption</code> \|\| Caption beneath the image.
			\|-
			\| <code>population</code> \|\| Total population figure or range.
			\|-
			\| <code>population_year</code> \|\| Year or range, shown in parentheses.
			\|-
			\| <code>population_ref</code> \|\| Optional <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> for the total.
			\|-
			\| <code>regions</code> \|\| Free-form bulleted list of regions with significant populations; nest sub-national rows with <code><nowiki>**</nowiki></code>. Put the supporting reference on the first (country) line.
			\|-
			\| <code>languages</code> \|\| Language(s), wikilinked.
			\|-
			\| <code>religion</code> \|\| Religion(s); summarise contested classifications briefly and point to the body.
			\|-
			\| <code>related_groups</code> \|\| Related ethnic groups, wikilinked.
			\|-
			\| <code>regional_cat</code> \|\| Optional second category (no <code>Category:</code> prefix). <code>Ethnic Groups</code> is always added automatically.
			\|}

			== Example ==
			See [[Santal people]].

			== See also ==
			* {{tl\|Infobox Country}}
			* {{tl\|Infobox Admin Subdivision}}

			<includeonly>{{sandbox other\|\|
			[[Category:Infobox templates]]
			}}</includeonly>

Template:Infobox Ethnic Group

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 07:48:01 GMT

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-<includeonly><templatestyles src="Infobox Ethnic Group/styles.css" />{| class="infobox ig-infobox"
+<includeonly><templatestyles src="Infobox Ethnic Group/styles.css" /><table class="infobox ig-infobox">
-|-
+<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-title">{{{name|{{PAGENAME}}}}}</th></tr>
-! colspan="2" class="ig-title" | {{{name|{{PAGENAME}}}}}
+{{#if:{{{native_name|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-native">{{{native_name}}}</th></tr>}}
-{{#if:{{{native_name|}}}|
+{{#if:{{{image|}}}|<tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-image">[[File:{{{image}}}|frameless|upright=1|alt={{{image_alt|}}}]]{{#if:{{{caption|}}}|<div class="ig-caption">{{{caption}}}</div>}}</td></tr>}}
-|-
+{{#if:{{{population|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-header">Total population</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-data">{{{population}}}{{#if:{{{population_year|}}}|&nbsp;({{{population_year}}})}}{{{population_ref|}}}</td></tr>}}
-! colspan="2" class="ig-native" | {{{native_name}}}
+{{#if:{{{regions|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-header">Regions with significant populations</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-data ig-regions">
-}}{{#if:{{{image|}}}|
+{{{regions}}}
-|-
+</td></tr>}}
-| colspan="2" class="ig-image" | [[File:{{{image}}}|frameless|upright=1|alt={{{image_alt|}}}]]{{#if:{{{caption|}}}|<div class="ig-caption">{{{caption}}}</div>}}
+{{#if:{{{languages|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-header">Languages</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-data">{{{languages}}}</td></tr>}}
-}}{{#if:{{{population|}}}|
+{{#if:{{{religion|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-header">Religion</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-data">{{{religion}}}</td></tr>}}
-|-
+{{#if:{{{related_groups|}}}|<tr><th colspan="2" class="ig-header">Related ethnic groups</th></tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="ig-data">{{{related_groups}}}</td></tr>}}
-! colspan="2" class="ig-header" | Total population
+</table>[[Category:Ethnic Groups]]{{#if:{{{regional_cat|}}}|[[Category:{{{regional_cat}}}]]}}</includeonly><noinclude>{{Documentation}}</noinclude>

Category:Ethnic Groups

Eloise Zomia — Sat, 30 May 2026 07:21:36 GMT

Created page with "Hub articles on ethnic and tribal communities, written as people-level overviews (demography, language, history, religion, culture). The class exists for communities whose cannabis traditions are documented on the wiki but which are not represented by a single state or country article. Sits under Category:Culture. Category:Culture"

New page

Hub articles on ethnic and tribal communities, written as people-level overviews (demography, language, history, religion, culture). The class exists for communities whose cannabis traditions are documented on the wiki but which are not represented by a single state or country article. Sits under [[:Category:Culture]].

[[Category:Culture]]